Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update request to version 2.66.0 🚀 #957

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

greenkeeperio-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello 👋

🚀🚀🚀

request just published its new version 2.66.0, which is not covered by your current version range.

If this pull request passes your tests you can publish your software with the latest version of request – otherwise use this branch to work on adaptions and fixes.

Happy fixing and merging 🌴


The new version differs by 57 commits .

  • 48e505d Update changelog
  • ff8b510 2.66.0
  • 4a1312c Merge pull request #1906 from ReadmeCritic/master
  • a30219a Missing anchor
  • a1ef680 Update README URLs based on HTTP redirects
  • a7f7e75 Merge pull request #1905 from simov/fix-body-buffer
  • cb5b7ac Convert typed arrays into regular buffers
  • 4ebc955 Merge branch 'master' into fix-pipe
  • 40984c0 Merge pull request #1902 from request/greenkeeper-node-uuid-1.4.7
  • 8605027 chore(package): update node-uuid to version 1.4.7
  • 973f0ee Merge pull request #1894 from falms/fix-tunneling-after-redirection-simple
  • 8b2a20c Merge pull request #1893 from request/greenkeeper-eslint-1.9.0
  • db7c4eb chore(package): update eslint to version 1.9.0
  • 6931cea Improve the write after error fix implemented in #1880
  • 7943dce Move the tunnel override flag initialization to the ctor

There are 57 commits in total. See the full diff.


This pull request was created by greenkeeper.io.
It keeps your software, up to date, all the time.

Tired of seeing this sponsor message? Upgrade to the supporter plan! You'll also get your pull requests faster ⚡

@jridgewell jridgewell deleted the greenkeeper-request-2.66.0 branch February 19, 2016 19:11
@henel677 henel677 mentioned this pull request Jan 21, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants