Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added dtm_sweep.py #338

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 30, 2023
Merged

Added dtm_sweep.py #338

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 30, 2023

Conversation

tim-magnusen
Copy link
Contributor

Created DTM sweep test based on conn_sweep.py framework.

Created DTM sweep test based on conn_sweep.py framework.
@sihyung-maxim
Copy link
Contributor

The SVD action will fail if the source branch of a PR is from a fork. There's a fix for this merged into main already, but this check isn't important for this PR as there were no register or SVD files that were changed.

@kevin-gillespie
Copy link
Contributor

@EricB-ADI
Copy link
Contributor

@kevin-gillespie It is effectively the same as conn_sweep_rsl15. @tim-magnusen did you plan on using any non MAX32 boards as a master such as a nordic? If you want I can add an option to use the vendor specific tx test instead of the vendor specific end test, so the nordic boards will still work.

@tim-magnusen
Copy link
Contributor Author

The goal is to do DTM sweeps between any board combination, so MExx and Nordig, or MExx and MExx, etc.
Conn_sweep is short for connection mode sweep and since DTM isn't connection mode, I called it dtm_sweep.

@EricB-ADI
Copy link
Contributor

@tim-magnusen The conn_sweep_rsl15 also uses DTM, it was named incorrectly. That will be changed soon. For now, I will merge this so you can use it. I will integrate options to use the end test vendor specific command so you can get more verbose information for receiver testing on MAX32 boards.

@EricB-ADI EricB-ADI merged commit 824c1c7 into analogdevicesinc:main Jan 30, 2023
@tim-magnusen tim-magnusen deleted the CI branch January 30, 2023 19:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants