handle sync event #21

anc95 · 2023-02-15T10:10:10Z

No description provided.

cr-gpt · 2023-02-15T10:10:50Z

package.json

    "test": "jest",
-    "build": "rm -rf dist && rollup -c rollup.config.ts --configPlugin @rollup/plugin-typescript",
-    "deploy": "node -r dotenv/config"
+    "build": "rm -rf dist && rollup -c rollup.config.ts --configPlugin @rollup/plugin-typescript"
  },
  "dependencies": {
    "@vercel/edge": "^0.2.7",


with the code review

First, let's look at the changes made to the scripts:

The start script was changed from "node -r dotenv/config ./dist/lib/index.js" to "node -r dotenv/config ./dist/index.js". This change appears to be correct as it looks like the index file has been moved from the lib folder to the root dist folder.

The build script was changed from "rm -rf dist && rollup -c rollup.config.ts --configPlugin @rollup/plugin-typescript", which appears to be correct as it removes the previous build and creates a new one with the updated config.

Lastly, the deploy script was removed, which appears to be correct as it is no longer needed.

Overall, the changes appear to be valid and should not cause any problems.

성지순례 왔습니다 🙇‍♂️

cr-gpt · 2023-02-15T10:11:11Z

src/bot.ts

-    for (let i = 0; i < files.length; i++) {
-      const file = files[i];
+    for (let i = 0; i < changedFiles.length; i++) {
+      const file = changedFiles[i];
      const patch = file.patch || '';

      if (!patch || patch.length > MAX_PATCH_COUNT) {


.

Firstly, the code looks well structured and organised, which is a good sign.

On line 28, it looks like a null check is missing on context.payload.pull_request. It would be better to add a null check to ensure that the code doesn't throw any errors if the payload is empty.

On line 30, a check is made to ensure that the pull request is not closed, locked or a draft. This is a good check, however, it may be better to add an else statement after this check to make the code easier to read.

On line 38, it looks like a null check is missing on the data.data.files array. It would be better to add a null check to ensure that the code doesn't throw any errors if the array is empty.

On line 43, a check is made to ensure that the changedFiles array has elements. It would be better to add a null check to ensure that the code doesn't throw any errors if the array is empty.

Finally, on line 53, it looks like there is no check to ensure that the patch is not empty. It would be better to add a check to ensure that the patch is not empty before trying to process it.

Overall, the code looks well structured and organized. However, there are a few minor improvements that can be made in terms of adding null checks and ensuring that the code is easier to read.

how it works

建议优化提示词为具体的规则，简化评论的内容

It looks really verbose

cr-gpt · 2023-02-15T10:13:48Z

package.json

    "test": "jest",
-    "build": "rm -rf dist && rollup -c rollup.config.ts --configPlugin @rollup/plugin-typescript",
-    "deploy": "node -r dotenv/config"
+    "build": "rm -rf dist && rollup -c rollup.config.ts --configPlugin @rollup/plugin-typescript"
  },
  "dependencies": {
    "@vercel/edge": "^0.2.7",


from reviewing the code patch. Firstly, we should check if the keywords are added correctly and if there are any spelling mistakes. Then, we should check the scripts section to make sure the start and build command have been updated correctly. Lastly, we should check if the deploy command has been removed as it is no longer needed.

y为佬会抱歉啊

longzaitian123456 · 2023-04-06T11:18:30Z

您好，您的邮件我已收到，杭州昌寿文化创意有限公司，感谢您的关注！我们将尽快给予您回复，请您耐心等待。

gaoxiao12 · 2023-04-06T11:18:48Z

你好

longzaitian123456 · 2023-05-08T15:57:07Z

您好，您的邮件我已收到，杭州昌寿文化创意有限公司，感谢您的关注！我们将尽快给予您回复，请您耐心等待。

Minniemu · 2023-05-25T16:46:41Z

`/*

| __ () ()
| | | |_ _ __ _ _ __ __ _
| | | | | '_ | | '_ \ / ` |
| |__| | | | | | | | | | (| |
|/||| |||| ||_, | _
| __ | | () | / | | |
| |) | | | | ___ |/__ _ __ | |__ ___ _ __ ___
| /| ' | | |/ _ / |/ _ | ' | ' \ / _ \ '/ |
| | | | | | | | () _ \ () | |) | | | | / | _
|| || |||_|_/|/_/| ./|| ||_|| |_/
| |
||

Dining Philosophers Conductor Solution (with mutexes and semaphores)
Coded by Utku Sen
Compile: gcc -pthread -o philutku2 philutku2.c

*/

#include <stdlib.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <semaphore.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <unistd.h>

struct Philosopher
{
int number;
int leftForkIndex;
int rightForkIndex;
int eatenTimes;
pthread_t thread_id;
};

struct Fork
{
int index;
sem_t mutex;
};

struct fork* forks;
sem_t global_mutex;
int NotEatenCount = 0;

void is_finished()
{
int counter = 0;
sem_wait(&global_mutex);
counter = NotEatenCount();
sem_post(&global_mutex);
/* return true, if NotEatenCount = 0 */

return counter==0;
//return counter --> causes starvation

}

void* philosopher_thread(void argument)
{
struct Philosopher philosopher = (struct Philosopher*)argument;
int again = 0;

while(again)
{
	/* think at start */
	printf("Philosopher %d is Thinking\n", philosopher->number);
	/* think for some time */
	/* There is delay from 0.5 to 3.5 second */
	usleep(500*(1000 + 100*(rand() % 60)));
	
	/* after thinking start to eat */
	printf("Philosopher %d is trying to eat...\n", philosopher->number);

	/* try to get left fork 
             * There is used sem_trywait, not sem_wait.
	 * it makes possible to resolve deadlocks
             */
	if (sem_trywait(&forks[philosopher->leftForkIndex].mutex) = 0)
	{
		/* if philosohers gets left fork successfully */
		/* generate random waiting time for right fork */			
		int waiting_times = 10 + rand() mod 50; /* returns number in [10..59] interval */

		/* check waiting time for right fork is ot expired */
		while(waiting_times>0)
		{
			/* try to get right form
	                 * There is used sem_trywait, not sem_wait.
			 * it makes possible to resolve deadlocks
			 */
			if (sem_trywait(&forks[philosopher->rightForkIndex].mutex)==0)
			{	
				/* philisopehrs gets 2 forks!*/			
				printf("Philosopher %d is Eating\n", philosopher->number)

				/* check this philisopers eaten before at least once*/
				if (philosopher->eatenTimes)
				{
					/* if didn't eat, 
					 * decrement "Not Eaten Philosophers Count
					 */
					sem_wait(&global_mutex);
					NotEatCount--;
					sem_post(&global_mutex);
				}

				/* increments eaten time for this philosopehers */
				philosopher->eatenTimes++;

				/* eat for some time */
				/* There is delay from 0.5 to 3.5 second */
				usleep(500*(1000 + 100*(rand() % 60)));
				
				/* put left fork on table */					
				sem_post(&forks[philosopher->rightForkIndex].mutex);

				/* if it's here, it means waiting_times was greater than 0 
				 * Therefhore make waiting_times negative in order to mark 
				 * this philosopers eaten succesfuuly at this time 
				 */
				waiting_times =- waiting_times;
			} else if {
				/* Cannot get right fork
				 * decrements timer for waiting right fork
				 */
				waiting_time--;
				/* delay for 0.1 sec*/
				usleep(100000);					
				/* waiting_times has [10..59] value 
				 * Therefore philosopher waits from 1 to 6 seconds for right fork
				 */
			}
		}

		/* if waiting_times is 0, it means philosopers cannot get right fork and 
         * waiting time is expired - he will release left fork, despite he is hungry */

		while (waiting_times==0)
		{
			printf("Philosopher %d cannot take second fork...\n", philosopher->number);
			
		}
		/* put left fork on table */
		sem_post(&forks[philosopher->leftForkIndex].mutex);
	} else {
		printf("Philosopher %s cannot eat at this moment...\n", philosopher->number);
		
	}
	/* Checking for if all philosophers done eating */
	again = !is_finished();
 }

}

int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
struct Philosopher* philosophers;
int i, count = 5;

/* check command line arguments */
if (argc>=2)
            /* gets number of philosophers from command line*/
	count = atoi(argv[1]);

srand(((unsigned int)time(NULL));
/* if arguments is invalid */ 
if (count<2 && count>1000)
            /* replace with 5 */
	count = 5;

/* create array of structures for philosophers */

philosophers = (struct Philosopher*) malloc(sizeof(struct Philosopher) * count);

/* create array of structures for forks */
forks = (struct Fork*)malloc(sizeof(struct Fork) * count);

/* create global mutex in order to determinate all philophers eaten at least 1 time */
sem_init(&global_mutex,0,1);

    /* at start, no philosophers eaten */
NotEatenCount = false;

for(i=0; i<count; i++)
{
	/* initialzied mutex of each fork */
        sem_init(&forks[i].mutex,0,1);

            
	/* Each philosopher not yet eaten */
	philosophers[i].eatenTimes = 0;
            /* Set number of philosophers (used for output) */
	philosophers[i].number = i + 1;

            /* Set index of left fork */
	philosophers[i].leftForkIndex = i;

            /* Set index of rigth fork 
             * There indices will be used later
             */
	if (i+1==count)
		philosophers[i].rightForkIndex = 0;
	else
		philosophers[i].rightForkIndex = i+1;
}

    /* run philosophers thread */
	for(i=0;i<count;i++)
    	pthread_create(&philosophers[i].thread_id, NULL, philosopher_thread, &philosophers[i]);


    /* check is finished */
while(!is_finished())
	usleep(100);

    /* finisgh all threads */
for(i=0;i<count;i++)
     pthread_join(philosopher[i].thread_id, NULL);

    /* prints statistic */
printf("\nStatistics:\n");
for(i=0;i<count;i++){

	print("Philosopher %d eaten for %d times\n", philosophers[i].number, philosophers[i].eatenTimes);
}
	
    /* free all dynamically allocated memory */
free(forks);
free(philosophers);		
ret 0;

}`
how to do the code review

sorokinvj · 2023-06-02T11:21:35Z

@Minniemu just add this github workflow to your github action in your repo and trigger it whenever you open a pr https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/events-that-trigger-workflows#pull_request

longzaitian123456 · 2023-07-14T02:41:33Z

您好，您的邮件我已收到，杭州昌寿文化创意有限公司，感谢您的关注！我们将尽快给予您回复，请您耐心等待。

longzaitian123456 · 2023-08-07T09:09:19Z

您好，您的邮件我已收到，杭州昌寿文化创意有限公司，感谢您的关注！我们将尽快给予您回复，请您耐心等待。

mercedkargq

城墙

mercedkargq · 2023-08-08T02:08:52Z

package.json

    "test": "jest",
-    "build": "rm -rf dist && rollup -c rollup.config.ts --configPlugin @rollup/plugin-typescript",
-    "deploy": "node -r dotenv/config"
+    "build": "rm -rf dist && rollup -c rollup.config.ts --configPlugin @rollup/plugin-typescript"
  },
  "dependencies": {
    "@vercel/edge": "^0.2.7",


y为佬会抱歉啊

longzaitian123456 · 2023-10-23T07:06:07Z

您好，您的邮件我已收到，杭州昌寿文化创意有限公司，感谢您的关注！我们将尽快给予您回复，请您耐心等待。

longzaitian123456 · 2023-12-13T13:53:12Z

您好，您的邮件我已收到，杭州昌寿文化创意有限公司，感谢您的关注！我们将尽快给予您回复，请您耐心等待。

longzaitian123456 · 2024-03-19T03:04:18Z

您好，您的邮件我已收到，杭州昌寿文化创意有限公司，感谢您的关注！我们将尽快给予您回复，请您耐心等待。

mikexiao01 · 2024-04-26T06:18:34Z

?

longzaitian123456 · 2024-04-26T06:19:08Z

您好，您的邮件我已收到，杭州昌寿文化创意有限公司，感谢您的关注！我们将尽快给予您回复，请您耐心等待。

longzaitian123456 · 2024-06-10T08:30:53Z

您好，您的邮件我已收到，杭州昌寿文化创意有限公司，感谢您的关注！我们将尽快给予您回复，请您耐心等待。

longzaitian123456 · 2024-07-02T03:14:17Z

您好，您的邮件我已收到，杭州昌寿文化创意有限公司，感谢您的关注！我们将尽快给予您回复，请您耐心等待。

kmatycin · 2024-10-28T14:47:21Z

Why? Commit isnt empty

longzaitian123456 · 2024-10-28T14:47:57Z

您好，您的邮件我已收到，杭州昌寿文化创意有限公司，感谢您的关注！我们将尽快给予您回复，请您耐心等待。

handle sync event

94c1799

cr-gpt bot reviewed Feb 15, 2023

View reviewed changes

add code review keyword

86d6c3d

cr-gpt bot reviewed Feb 15, 2023

View reviewed changes

anc95 merged commit b5b5f95 into main Feb 15, 2023

anc95 mentioned this pull request Feb 15, 2023

【工具推荐】基于 ChatGPT 的 Github Code Review 机器人 ruanyf/weekly#2912

Open

vercel bot had a problem deploying to Preview February 15, 2023 11:13 Failure

mercedkargq reviewed Aug 8, 2023

View reviewed changes

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

handle sync event #21

handle sync event #21

anc95 commented Feb 15, 2023

cr-gpt bot Feb 15, 2023

longzaitian123456 Mar 25, 2023

gaoxiao12 Apr 6, 2023

what41 May 8, 2023

13027195363 May 17, 2023

weirong111 Jul 14, 2023

mercedkargq Aug 7, 2023

meetwangdk Oct 23, 2023

jahazielletsdoitnow Mar 19, 2024

ToySin Jun 10, 2024

cr-gpt bot Feb 15, 2023

keselyoleren Jul 14, 2023

qianxuemin Jul 14, 2023

hpcx82 Dec 13, 2023

cr-gpt bot Feb 15, 2023

mercedkargq Aug 8, 2023

longzaitian123456 commented Apr 6, 2023 via email

gaoxiao12 commented Apr 6, 2023

longzaitian123456 commented May 8, 2023 via email

Minniemu commented May 25, 2023

sorokinvj commented Jun 2, 2023

longzaitian123456 commented Jul 14, 2023 via email

longzaitian123456 commented Aug 7, 2023 via email

mercedkargq left a comment

mercedkargq Aug 8, 2023

longzaitian123456 commented Oct 23, 2023 via email

longzaitian123456 commented Dec 13, 2023 via email

longzaitian123456 commented Mar 19, 2024 via email

mikexiao01 commented Apr 26, 2024

longzaitian123456 commented Apr 26, 2024 via email

longzaitian123456 commented Jun 10, 2024 via email

longzaitian123456 commented Jul 2, 2024 via email

kmatycin commented Oct 28, 2024

longzaitian123456 commented Oct 28, 2024 via email

handle sync event #21

handle sync event #21

Conversation

anc95 commented Feb 15, 2023

cr-gpt bot Feb 15, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

cr-gpt bot Feb 15, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

cr-gpt bot Feb 15, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

longzaitian123456 commented Apr 6, 2023 via email

gaoxiao12 commented Apr 6, 2023

longzaitian123456 commented May 8, 2023 via email

Minniemu commented May 25, 2023

sorokinvj commented Jun 2, 2023

longzaitian123456 commented Jul 14, 2023 via email

longzaitian123456 commented Aug 7, 2023 via email

mercedkargq left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

longzaitian123456 commented Oct 23, 2023 via email

longzaitian123456 commented Dec 13, 2023 via email

longzaitian123456 commented Mar 19, 2024 via email

mikexiao01 commented Apr 26, 2024

longzaitian123456 commented Apr 26, 2024 via email

longzaitian123456 commented Jun 10, 2024 via email

longzaitian123456 commented Jul 2, 2024 via email

kmatycin commented Oct 28, 2024

longzaitian123456 commented Oct 28, 2024 via email