-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 585
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow scanning unpacked container filesystems #1485
Conversation
@jedevc it looks like you might just need to update a test (the ID is calculated based on the fields in the struct and one was added): https://github.com/anchore/syft/actions/runs/3958281654/jobs/6779661340#step:7:165 |
We can use the already existing file tree to peform symlink resolution for FilesByPath, instead of traversing the symlinks again. This moves all of the symlink logic into the indexing code, and then we can rely on syft's resolution algorithm over the index in this part of the codebase. Signed-off-by: Justin Chadwell <me@jedevc.com>
The new base parameter is an optional parameter for the directory resolver that resolves all symlinks relative to this root. There are two intended use cases: - base = "/". The previous behavior, symlinks are resolved relative to the root filesystem. - base = path. Symlinks are resolved relative to the target filesystem, allowing correct behavior when scanning unpacked container filesystems on disk. Signed-off-by: Justin Chadwell <me@jedevc.com>
Signed-off-by: Justin Chadwell <me@jedevc.com>
d176a76
to
d1d5fa1
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nice improvement 👍 this additionally further leverages the already built indexes which helps some upcoming PRs regarding performance boosts
Would love to the see this feature make it to the CLI. We have a use case for wanting to run syft on a root filesystem and have it work just like syft does against an existing docker image today. |
I don't currently have the bandwidth to go and add the feature, but it should be a fairly simple plumbing exercise now that the underlying code is there, so happy for someone else to pick that up 🎉 |
* source: avoid second-step of symlink resolution in directory resolver We can use the already existing file tree to peform symlink resolution for FilesByPath, instead of traversing the symlinks again. This moves all of the symlink logic into the indexing code, and then we can rely on syft's resolution algorithm over the index in this part of the codebase. Signed-off-by: Justin Chadwell <me@jedevc.com> * source: add base parameter to directory resolver The new base parameter is an optional parameter for the directory resolver that resolves all symlinks relative to this root. There are two intended use cases: - base = "/". The previous behavior, symlinks are resolved relative to the root filesystem. - base = path. Symlinks are resolved relative to the target filesystem, allowing correct behavior when scanning unpacked container filesystems on disk. Signed-off-by: Justin Chadwell <me@jedevc.com> * source: add tests for new base parameter Signed-off-by: Justin Chadwell <me@jedevc.com> --------- Signed-off-by: Justin Chadwell <me@jedevc.com>
🐛 Fixes #1359 🎉
This PR is an attempt to explore how to modify the existing directory resolver to allow for resolving symlinks in an unpacked container filesystem. To do this, we add a new optional
base
parameter for the directory resolver that resolves all symlinks relative to this base. There are two intended use cases:base = "/"
. The previous behavior, symlinks are resolved relative to the root filesystem.base = path
. Symlinks are resolved relative to the target filesystem, allowing correct behavior when scanning unpacked container filesystems on disk.Currently, this only modifies the API surface for the source, which would probably be sufficient for my use case in buildkit-syft-scanner.
I've marked this as in-draft since I've only done some preliminary testing, but the following things probably need working out before this could be ready:
root-dir
input type, or similar? Not quite sure on naming, I don't have any particular preference here.filepath.EvalSymlinks
withcfs.RootPath
from containerd/continuity. The logic of these functions is fairly similar, however, the containerd equivalent allows bounding the result to a specified directory.This logic is only needed for 1 of the symlink resolution components - the other is much simpler, since syft does the heavy lifting. I'm not sure how the maintainers feel about adding this as a new dependency? Maybe there's a simpler solution I'm not seeing 👀
Update: I can remove this dependency, since we can avoid this second instance of doing symlink resolution - we can just use the file tree that we've already indexed over, which should be more efficient anyways. I think that this is a valid use? It seems to work in the cases I tried it on.
cc @wagoodman @kzantow