We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
decltype
&
https://cppinsights.io/s/6f62be64 vs https://cppinsights.io/s/8b0c93a7
In the case where the decltype(v) is followed by &, the type does not get resolved. Is this wanted behaviour?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello @niklasnolte,
thank you for spotting & reporting this. I consider it a bug and not the wanted behaviour. A fix is on its way.
Andreas
Sorry, something went wrong.
Fixed #286: Desugar decltype(x) even when it is an LValueReference.
9bcbc4e
This case was missed before and should be expanded as well. A few other places turned up which profit from that change.
thanks for the quick fix @andreasfertig !
Merge pull request #287 from andreasfertig/fixIssue286
626830d
No branches or pull requests
https://cppinsights.io/s/6f62be64 vs https://cppinsights.io/s/8b0c93a7
In the case where the decltype(v) is followed by &, the type does not get resolved.
Is this wanted behaviour?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: