You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If the manifold is a plane, and regular > 0, then basis functions are placed regularly within the bounding box of data, with the smallest number of basis functions in each row or column equal to the value of regular in the coarsest resolution (note, this is just the smallest number of basis functions). Subsequent resolutions have twice the number of basis functions in each row or column.
However, the numbers here seem to be incorrect. The part of the code (lines 460 and 461) for the number of basis functions in placed in resolution i is round(nx*(3^(i)), where i ranges from 1 to nres, (assuming x is the wider dimension, so nx<-regular on line 416, the same applies if y is the wider dimension of course).
This means that the number of basis function at the coarsest resolution is actually 3 times the value of regular, and subsequent resolutions have thrice the number of basis functions in each row/column.
Really sorry if I have misunderstood the documentation of course!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 8:51 PM Evan Tate Paterson Hughes < ***@***.***> wrote:
In the documentation for auto_basis
<https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/FRK/versions/2.3.1>, it says
If the manifold is a plane, and regular > 0, then basis functions are
placed regularly within the bounding box of data, with the smallest number
of basis functions in each row or column equal to the value of regular in
the coarsest resolution (note, this is just the smallest number of basis
functions). Subsequent resolutions have twice the number of basis functions
in each row or column.
However, the numbers here seem to be incorrect. The part of the code
(lines 460 and 461) for the number of basis functions in placed in
resolution i is round(nx*(3^(i)), where i ranges from 1 to nres,
(assuming x is the wider dimension, so nx<-regular on line 416, the same
applies if y is the wider dimension of course).
This means that the number of basis function at the coarsest resolution is
actually 3 times the value of regular, and subsequent resolutions have
*thrice* the number of basis functions in each row/column.
Really sorry if I have misunderstood the documentation of course!
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#9>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABEU3PQTLQAJTFSLDLQ623ZXKUDLAVCNFSM6AAAAABOPUK3T6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGUZTKOJYG4ZDCMA>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
In the documentation for auto_basis, it says
However, the numbers here seem to be incorrect. The part of the code (lines 460 and 461) for the number of basis functions in placed in resolution
i
isround(nx*(3^(i))
, wherei
ranges from1
tonres
, (assuming x is the wider dimension, sonx<-regular
on line 416, the same applies if y is the wider dimension of course).This means that the number of basis function at the coarsest resolution is actually 3 times the value of regular, and subsequent resolutions have thrice the number of basis functions in each row/column.
Really sorry if I have misunderstood the documentation of course!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: