Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Enhanced withCallState to accept mutliple collection configuration #148

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

abhijit-chikane
Copy link

@abhijit-chikane abhijit-chikane commented Feb 16, 2025

feat: Enhanced withCallState to accept mutliple collection configuration
For #147
I have not tested it but happy to help if in case it didn't work as expected
thanks

@abhijit-chikane abhijit-chikane marked this pull request as draft February 16, 2025 11:08
@abhijit-chikane
Copy link
Author

This requires additional changes and need to fix the typescript errors

Verified

This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature.
…ns with an array
…ation backward compatibility

Verified

This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature.
…ns with an array
@rainerhahnekamp rainerhahnekamp added the ready-for-review This feature has been implemented and is ready for a review. label Mar 4, 2025
@abhijit-chikane
Copy link
Author

@rainerhahnekamp did you get time to review this?
Let me know if anything needs to be done from my side
Thanks!

Copy link
Collaborator

@rainerhahnekamp rainerhahnekamp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well done and sorry for the late reply. What I'm currently asking myself, if we could use collections instead of collection to support the array of strings?

Would that be a big issue?

@abhijit-chikane
Copy link
Author

abhijit-chikane commented Mar 18, 2025

Well done and sorry for the late reply. What I'm currently asking myself, if we could use collections instead of collection to support the array of strings?

Would that be a big issue?

Well initially I did exactly that but then it would be a breaking change
That’s why I reverted it back to ‘collection’

@rainerhahnekamp
Copy link
Collaborator

it would be a breaking change

In which regard? To me, it would be an additional property. It would be breaking if collections was available in the past and now got its behavior changed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-for-review This feature has been implemented and is ready for a review.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants