You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 12, 2024. It is now read-only.
This seems like it's completely the wrong way around to me, if you want to do a simple fadeOut -> fadeIn animation, you can't get it to look good because the new view pushes the old view down instantly.
I guess you could change the animation to a keyframed anim and set display: none until it starts, but it's a bit overkill..?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It does this because the previous scope+element gets cleaned up (scope destroyed + leave animation), and then by the time the enter animation occurs it uses the transclusion anchor as the previous sibling. This is set like this because if there are no animations then the leave element is gone by the time the enter insertion comes up and it has no element to insert after (aside from the transclusion anchor). This should be changed though.
This seems like it's completely the wrong way around to me, if you want to do a simple fadeOut -> fadeIn animation, you can't get it to look good because the new view pushes the old view down instantly.
I guess you could change the animation to a keyframed anim and set
display: none
until it starts, but it's a bit overkill..?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: