Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Apr 12, 2024. It is now read-only.

docs(ngJq): update to indicate common pitfall #11780

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kentcdodds
Copy link

change docs for ngJq so it mentions that the placement of the directive is important with regards to the angular script.

Closes #11779

change docs for ngJq so it mentions that the placement of the directive is important with regards to the angular script.

Closes angular#11779
@caitp
Copy link
Contributor

caitp commented Apr 30, 2015

It looks good to me. I think fixing the caveat would cause more problems than it's worth, but @petebacondarwin can make a call on that

@petebacondarwin
Copy link
Contributor

This LGTM. Feel free to merge.

@petebacondarwin petebacondarwin added this to the 1.4.0-rc.2 milestone May 1, 2015
@caitp caitp self-assigned this May 1, 2015
@caitp
Copy link
Contributor

caitp commented May 1, 2015

maybe the wording could be improved a bit, I mean we're starting a sentence with a preposition here, it reads kinda weird. but it's good enough for now, followup wording fixups welcome

@caitp caitp closed this in 40e00cd May 1, 2015
@petebacondarwin
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @caitp

netman92 pushed a commit to netman92/angular.js that referenced this pull request Aug 8, 2015
change docs for ngJq so it mentions that the placement of the directive is important with regards to the angular script.

Closes angular#11779
Closes angular#11780
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ng-jq only works on html tag
4 participants