-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27.4k
docs(*): document the breaking change introduced in e1da4be #15434
docs(*): document the breaking change introduced in e1da4be #15434
Conversation
- **input:** add support for binding to `input[type=range]` ([913016](https://github.com/angular/angular.js/commit/9130166767c4792c5d32d08a918fc7becf32c9a6) [#5892](https://github.com/angular/angular.js/issues/5892) [#14870](https://github.com/angular/angular.js/issues/14870)) | ||
- **input:** | ||
- add support for binding to `input[type=range]` ([913016](https://github.com/angular/angular.js/commit/9130166767c4792c5d32d08a918fc7becf32c9a6) [#5892](https://github.com/angular/angular.js/issues/5892) [#14870](https://github.com/angular/angular.js/issues/14870)) | ||
- add support for `step` to `input[type=number]` ([e1da4be](https://github.com/angular/angular.js/commit/e1da4bed8e291003d485a8ad346ab80bed8ae2e3) [#10597](https://github.com/angular/angular.js/issues/10597)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that these two 913016 and e1da4be should be features.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
They are 😃 Tricked by the shortened GitHub diff?
|
||
If you want to restore the previous behavior (disabling `step` validation), but still want to be | ||
able to use the `step` attribute, you can overwrite the built-in `step` validator by using a custom | ||
directive. For example: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about?
If you want to restore the previous behavior (use the step attribute while disabling step validation), you can overwrite ...
Good work @gkalpak as usual you put me to shame by being much more fastidious than me :-) |
Nah! We're rather taking turns at that 😃 |
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
Docs update.
What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)
Although e1da4be introduced a breaking change, it wasn't documented as such.
What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
The breaking change is documented.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No.
(In a way. "Let me introduce you this breaking change. It has been around for 2 releases, but I don't think you've met.)"
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)