Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 12, 2024. It is now read-only.

fix(ng-bind-html): watch string value instead of wrapper #4087

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 20, 2013

Conversation

chirayuk
Copy link
Contributor

Ref: #4045

I have this sinking feeling that support this use case sort of
encourages binding to function that blindly trust some html. For now,
I'm fixing the issue while I think about the use cases some more.

In the case of a function that performs any non-trivial work before
wrapping the value (e.g. the showdown filter in issue #3980, or the
binding to a simply wrapper function in issue #3932 if it did anything
meaty), this fix makes it "work" - but performance is going to suck -
you should bind to some other thing on scope that watches the actual
source and adjusts itself when that changes (e.g. the showdown filter.)
For the case of the wrapper in #3932, if one isn't performing
sanitization or some such thing - then you the developer has insight
into why that value is safe in that particular context - and it should
be available simply by name and not as a result of a function taking any
arbitrary input to make auditing of security a little saner.

Closes #3932, #3980

Ref: angular#4045

I have this sinking feeling that support this use case sort of
encourages binding to function that blindly trust some html.  For now,
I'm fixing the issue while I think about the use cases some more.

In the case of a function that performs any non-trivial work before
wrapping the value (e.g. the showdown filter in issue angular#3980, or the
binding to a simply wrapper function in issue angular#3932 if it did anything
meaty), this fix makes it "work" - but performance is going to suck -
you should bind to some other thing on scope that watches the actual
source and adjusts itself when that changes (e.g. the showdown filter.)
For the case of the wrapper in angular#3932, if one isn't performing
sanitization or some such thing - then you the developer has insight
into why that value is safe in that particular context - and it should
be available simply by name and not as a result of a function taking any
arbitrary input to make auditing of security a little saner.

Closes angular#3932, angular#3980
@mary-poppins
Copy link

lovely! I think I like you better than @btford now! ;)

@chirayuk chirayuk merged commit e2068ad into angular:master Sep 20, 2013
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 $digest() iterations reached using $sce inside isolate scope directive 1.2.0-rc.2
3 participants