Skip to content

Conversation

@crisbeto
Copy link
Member

The logic that figures out the outline gap in the presence of a prefix was producing a negative width which is invalid. It seems like this has been there since the beginning, but we haven't noticed it, because our dev app doesn't have many examples with a prefix and it always starts off from LTR and we switch it to RTL manually which doesn't have this problem since it already got a valid width while it was in LTR.

Fixes #18857.

@crisbeto crisbeto added P2 The issue is important to a large percentage of users, with a workaround target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release labels Mar 19, 2020
@crisbeto crisbeto requested a review from mmalerba as a code owner March 19, 2020 19:42
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Mar 19, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@mmalerba mmalerba left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mmalerba mmalerba added lgtm action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker labels Mar 19, 2020
…ence of a prefix

The logic that figures out the outline gap in the presence of a prefix was producing a negative width which is invalid. It seems like this has been there since the beginning, but we haven't noticed it, because our dev app doesn't have many examples with a prefix and it always starts off from LTR and we switch it to RTL manually which doesn't have this problem since it already got a valid width while it was in LTR.

Fixes angular#18857.
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 21, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement P2 The issue is important to a large percentage of users, with a workaround target: patch This PR is targeted for the next patch release

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Mat-form-field outline rendered incorrectly when direction='rtl'

3 participants