-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support SELENIUM_PROMISE_MANAGER=0
#69
Labels
Comments
sjelin
added a commit
to sjelin/jasminewd
that referenced
this issue
Dec 17, 2016
…E_MANAGER=0 There are three major ways this was done in this change: * In `callWhenIdle`, if `flow.isIdle` is not defined, we assume we are working with a `SimpleScheduler` instance, and so the flow is effectively idle. * In `wrapInControlFlow`, we use `flow.promise` to create a new promise if possible. Since `new webdriver.promise.Promise()` would have always made a `ManagedPromise`, but `flow.promise` will do the right thing. * In `wrapCompare`, we avoid the webdriver library entirely, and never instance any extra promises. Using `webdriver.promise.when` and `webdriver.promise.all` could have been a problem if our instance of `webdriver` had the control flow turned on, but another instance somewhere did not (or even the same instance, but just at a different point in time). I also added code to extract promises out of deferreds. This is needed for selenium 3.x, and Craig already implemented a solution in the beta branch (70c9f62), but I was worried about what could happen if there were multiple versions of `selenium-webdriver` floating around. This change extracts promises without using `instanceof`. As an added bonus, it now works with `q`'s deferreds too! I also also fixed a minor bug where we weren't correctly checking for promises inside an array of expected results. Before we had ```js expected = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 0) ... webdriver.promise.isPromise(expected) ``` I thought about it for a little while, and there's no way that's correct. `expected` is an `Array<any>`, there's no way it has a `.then` function. Might close angular#69 once we rebase `beta` against this, but I haven't checked.
sjelin
added a commit
to sjelin/jasminewd
that referenced
this issue
Jan 11, 2017
…E_MANAGER=0 There are three major ways this was done in this change: * In `callWhenIdle`, if `flow.isIdle` is not defined, we assume we are working with a `SimpleScheduler` instance, and so the flow is effectively idle. * In `initJasmineWd`, if `flow.reset` is not defined, we assume we are working with a `SimpleScheduler` instance, and so don't bother resetting the flow. * In `wrapInControlFlow`, we use `flow.promise` to create a new promise if possible. Since `new webdriver.promise.Promise()` would have always made a `ManagedPromise`, but `flow.promise` will do the right thing. * In `wrapCompare`, we avoid the webdriver library entirely, and never instance any extra promises. Using `webdriver.promise.when` and `webdriver.promise.all` could have been a problem if our instance of `webdriver` had the control flow turned on, but another instance somewhere did not (or even the same instance, but just at a different point in time). Instead we use the new `maybePromise` tool, which is a mess but is also exactly what we want. * In `specs/*`, we replace `webdriver.promise.fulfilled` with `webdriver.promise.when`. * In `specs/*`, a new version of `adapterSpec.js` and `errorSpec.js` are created: `asyncAwaitAdapterSpec.ts` and `asyncAwaitErrorSpec.ts`. I also also fixed a minor bug where we weren't correctly checking for promises inside an array of expected results. Before we had ```js expected = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 0) ... webdriver.promise.isPromise(expected) ``` I thought about it for a little while, and there's no way that's correct. `expected` is an `Array<any>`, there's no way it has a `.then` function. Closes angular#69
sjelin
added a commit
to sjelin/jasminewd
that referenced
this issue
Jan 11, 2017
There are three major ways this was done in this change: * In `callWhenIdle`, if `flow.isIdle` is not defined, we assume we are working with a `SimpleScheduler` instance, and so the flow is effectively idle. * In `initJasmineWd`, if `flow.reset` is not defined, we assume we are working with a `SimpleScheduler` instance, and so don't bother resetting the flow. * In `wrapInControlFlow`, we use `flow.promise` to create a new promise if possible. Since `new webdriver.promise.Promise()` would have always made a `ManagedPromise`, but `flow.promise` will do the right thing. * In `wrapCompare`, we avoid the webdriver library entirely, and never instance any extra promises. Using `webdriver.promise.when` and `webdriver.promise.all` could have been a problem if our instance of `webdriver` had the control flow turned on, but another instance somewhere did not (or even the same instance, but just at a different point in time). Instead we use the new `maybePromise` tool, which is a mess but is also exactly what we want. * In `specs/*`, we replace `webdriver.promise.fulfilled` with `webdriver.promise.when`. * In `specs/*`, a new version of `adapterSpec.js` and `errorSpec.js` are created: `asyncAwaitAdapterSpec.ts` and `asyncAwaitErrorSpec.ts`. I also also fixed a minor bug where we weren't correctly checking for promises inside an array of expected results. Before we had ```js expected = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 0) ... webdriver.promise.isPromise(expected) ``` I thought about it for a little while, and there's no way that's correct. `expected` is an `Array<any>`, there's no way it has a `.then` function. Closes angular#69
sjelin
added a commit
to sjelin/jasminewd
that referenced
this issue
Jan 12, 2017
There are three major ways this was done in this change: * In `callWhenIdle`, if `flow.isIdle` is not defined, we assume we are working with a `SimpleScheduler` instance, and so the flow is effectively idle. * In `initJasmineWd`, if `flow.reset` is not defined, we assume we are working with a `SimpleScheduler` instance, and so don't bother resetting the flow. * In `wrapInControlFlow`, we use `flow.promise` to create a new promise if possible. Since `new webdriver.promise.Promise()` would have always made a `ManagedPromise`, but `flow.promise` will do the right thing. * In `wrapCompare`, we avoid the webdriver library entirely, and never instance any extra promises. Using `webdriver.promise.when` and `webdriver.promise.all` could have been a problem if our instance of `webdriver` had the control flow turned on, but another instance somewhere did not (or even the same instance, but just at a different point in time). Instead we use the new `maybePromise` tool, which is a mess but is also exactly what we want. * In `specs/*`, we replace `webdriver.promise.fulfilled` with `webdriver.promise.when`. * In `specs/*`, a new version of `adapterSpec.js` and `errorSpec.js` are created: `asyncAwaitAdapterSpec.ts` and `asyncAwaitErrorSpec.ts`. I also also fixed a minor bug where we weren't correctly checking for promises inside an array of expected results. Before we had ```js expected = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 0) ... webdriver.promise.isPromise(expected) ``` I thought about it for a little while, and there's no way that's correct. `expected` is an `Array<any>`, there's no way it has a `.then` function. Closes angular#69
sjelin
added a commit
to sjelin/jasminewd
that referenced
this issue
Jan 12, 2017
There are three major ways this was done in this change: * In `callWhenIdle`, if `flow.isIdle` is not defined, we assume we are working with a `SimpleScheduler` instance, and so the flow is effectively idle. * In `initJasmineWd`, if `flow.reset` is not defined, we assume we are working with a `SimpleScheduler` instance, and so don't bother resetting the flow. * In `wrapInControlFlow`, we use `flow.promise` to create a new promise if possible. Since `new webdriver.promise.Promise()` would have always made a `ManagedPromise`, but `flow.promise` will do the right thing. * In `wrapCompare`, we avoid the webdriver library entirely, and never instance any extra promises. Using `webdriver.promise.when` and `webdriver.promise.all` could have been a problem if our instance of `webdriver` had the control flow turned on, but another instance somewhere did not (or even the same instance, but just at a different point in time). Instead we use the new `maybePromise` tool, which is a mess but is also exactly what we want. * In `specs/*`, we replace `webdriver.promise.fulfilled` with `webdriver.promise.when`. * In `specs/*`, a new version of `adapterSpec.js` and `errorSpec.js` are created: `asyncAwaitAdapterSpec.ts` and `asyncAwaitErrorSpec.ts`. I also also fixed a minor bug where we weren't correctly checking for promises inside an array of expected results. Before we had ```js expected = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 0) ... webdriver.promise.isPromise(expected) ``` I thought about it for a little while, and there's no way that's correct. `expected` is an `Array<any>`, there's no way it has a `.then` function. Closes angular#69
sjelin
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 13, 2017
…72) There are three major ways this was done in this change: * In `callWhenIdle`, if `flow.isIdle` is not defined, we assume we are working with a `SimpleScheduler` instance, and so the flow is effectively idle. * In `initJasmineWd`, if `flow.reset` is not defined, we assume we are working with a `SimpleScheduler` instance, and so don't bother resetting the flow. * In `wrapInControlFlow`, we use `flow.promise` to create a new promise if possible. Since `new webdriver.promise.Promise()` would have always made a `ManagedPromise`, but `flow.promise` will do the right thing. * In `wrapCompare`, we avoid the webdriver library entirely, and never instance any extra promises. Using `webdriver.promise.when` and `webdriver.promise.all` could have been a problem if our instance of `webdriver` had the control flow turned on, but another instance somewhere did not (or even the same instance, but just at a different point in time). Instead we use the new `maybePromise` tool, which is a mess but is also exactly what we want. * In `specs/*`, we replace `webdriver.promise.fulfilled` with `webdriver.promise.when`. * In `specs/*`, a new version of `adapterSpec.js` and `errorSpec.js` are created: `asyncAwaitAdapterSpec.ts` and `asyncAwaitErrorSpec.ts`. I also also fixed a minor bug where we weren't correctly checking for promises inside an array of expected results. Before we had ```js expected = Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 0) ... webdriver.promise.isPromise(expected) ``` I thought about it for a little while, and there's no way that's correct. `expected` is an `Array<any>`, there's no way it has a `.then` function. Closes #69
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
See SeleniumHQ/selenium#2969 for details
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: