Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 5, 2024. It is now read-only.

Switched RawGit for GitCDN #3262

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Switched RawGit for GitCDN #3262

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

schme16
Copy link
Contributor

@schme16 schme16 commented Jun 15, 2015

Due to the damage than can be caused to Ryan (owner of RawGit) if people abuse the dev link, I've switched it to GitCDN, it lets you get the latest master branch, without losing the CDN and without it's service getting harmed.

Full disclosure, I am the maintainer of GitCDN

Due to the damage than can be caused to Ryan (owner of RawGit) if people abuse the dev link, I've switched it to GitCDN, it lets you get the latest master branch, without losing the CDN and without it's service getting harmed.

Full disclosure, I am the maintainer of GitCDN
@googlebot
Copy link

Thanks for your pull request. It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project, in which case you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please visit https://cla.developers.google.com/ to sign.

Once you've signed, please reply here (e.g. I signed it!) and we'll verify. Thanks.


  • If you've already signed a CLA, it's possible we don't have your GitHub username or you're using a different email address. Check your existing CLA data and verify that your email is set on your git commits.
  • If you signed the CLA as a corporation, please let us know the company's name.

@schme16
Copy link
Contributor Author

schme16 commented Jun 15, 2015

I signed it!

On Mon, 15 Jun 2015 10:59 googlebot notifications@github.com wrote:

Thanks for your pull request. It looks like this may be your first
contribution to a Google open source project, in which case you'll need to
sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

[image: 📝] Please visit https://cla.developers.google.com/
https://cla.developers.google.com/ to sign.

Once you've signed, please reply here (e.g. I signed it!) and we'll

verify. Thanks.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#3262 (comment).

@googlebot
Copy link

CLAs look good, thanks!

kseamon added a commit to kseamon/material that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2015
Implements a virtual repeater to use instead of ng-repeat for substantially
better performance in components.

review edits

Make tests pass in FF.

fix(tabs): prevents error on empty tab list

Closes angular#3264

fix(button): fixes button styles for components that override their default styles

chore(toast): fix type typo in toast docs (`boolean` > `string`).

fix(utils): update for Angular 1.4.1 compatibility

Fixes angular#3315, Fixes angular#3325.

fix(icons): improve use of material-icons style

Improve logic to auto-add `.material-icons` style to **md-icon**.
> NOTE: will not auto-add if using any class or ng-class attributes; see demoFontIconsWithLigatures

Fixes angular#3333.

update(icon): removed **ddescribe** used for isolated karma tests

update(docs, icon): clarify auto-add of 'material-icons' style.

update(build): use of Angular v1.4.1

update(util): update initOptionalProperties() implementation

Closes angular#3316.

feat(menu): do not propagate event in mdOpenMenu

Do not propagate the event in mdOpenMenu. This way a menu can be nested in elements that also have handlers of the same event type, without triggering any of these events. To enable this functionality, `$event` should be passed as the first argument to `$mdOpenMenu`.

Fixes angular#3296. Closes angular#3332.

update(tests, mocks):  test for stopPropogation

angular-material-mocks captures $timeout.flush() errors.
add menu event propogation test

Switched RawGit for GitCDN

Switch to GitCDN, which lets you get the latest master branch, without losing the CDN and without it's service getting harmed.

Closes angular#3262.

update(README): change docs to reference 0.10.0

Closes angular#3319.
@gkalpak
Copy link
Member

gkalpak commented Jun 18, 2015

@ThomasBurleson, could also the "Edit in CodePen" thningy (at least for HEAD (master) version of the docs) benefit from GitCDN ?

@schme16
Copy link
Contributor Author

schme16 commented Jun 22, 2015

@gkalpak: I believe it will help just as much, good suggestion!

@ThomasBurleson
Copy link
Contributor

@gkalpak - good catch/idea. I will make it so.

@schme16 schme16 deleted the patch-1 branch June 22, 2015 05:06
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants