Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 29, 2024. It is now read-only.

chore(types): make ElementArrayFinder more generic #3977

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 27, 2017
Merged

chore(types): make ElementArrayFinder more generic #3977

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 27, 2017

Conversation

jnorkus
Copy link

@jnorkus jnorkus commented Jan 15, 2017

Add some generics to ElementArrayFinder methods.

@googlebot
Copy link

Thanks for your pull request. It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please visit https://cla.developers.google.com/ to sign.

Once you've signed, please reply here (e.g. I signed it!) and we'll verify. Thanks.


  • If you've already signed a CLA, it's possible we don't have your GitHub username or you're using a different email address. Check your existing CLA data and verify that your email is set on your git commits.
  • If you signed the CLA as a corporation, please let us know the company's name.

1 similar comment
@googlebot
Copy link

Thanks for your pull request. It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please visit https://cla.developers.google.com/ to sign.

Once you've signed, please reply here (e.g. I signed it!) and we'll verify. Thanks.


  • If you've already signed a CLA, it's possible we don't have your GitHub username or you're using a different email address. Check your existing CLA data and verify that your email is set on your git commits.
  • If you signed the CLA as a corporation, please let us know the company's name.

@jnorkus
Copy link
Author

jnorkus commented Jan 15, 2017

I signed it!

@googlebot
Copy link

CLAs look good, thanks!

1 similar comment
@googlebot
Copy link

CLAs look good, thanks!

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants