-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
vc4-drm: asynchronous atomic pageflipping still not working? #40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Async pageflips should be working, and given the performance boosts I've seen, it seemed like they were. You probably want to instrument vc4_atomic_commit() to see where you might be blocking. |
My best guess would be that you were running into a lack of commit e7c31f6 in the kernel, and the userspace was submitting the next flip before it should try to. Closing due to previous lack of feedback, feel free to reopen if you have more debug. |
commit f581a0d upstream. wl1251: add a missing spin_lock_init() This fixes the following kernel warning: [ 5668.771453] BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, kworker/u2:3/9745 [ 5668.771850] lock: 0xce63ef20, .magic: 00000000, .owner: <none>/-1, .owner_cpu: 0 [ 5668.772277] CPU: 0 PID: 9745 Comm: kworker/u2:3 Tainted: G W 4.12.0-03002-gec979a4-dirty #40 [ 5668.772796] Hardware name: Nokia RX-51 board [ 5668.773071] Workqueue: phy1 wl1251_irq_work [ 5668.773345] [<c010c9e4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010a274>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [ 5668.773803] [<c010a274>] (show_stack) from [<c01545a4>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0x6c/0xa0) [ 5668.774230] [<c01545a4>] (do_raw_spin_lock) from [<c06ca578>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x10/0x18) [ 5668.774658] [<c06ca578>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave) from [<c048c010>] (wl1251_op_tx+0x38/0x5c) [ 5668.775115] [<c048c010>] (wl1251_op_tx) from [<c06a12e8>] (ieee80211_tx_frags+0x188/0x1c0) [ 5668.775543] [<c06a12e8>] (ieee80211_tx_frags) from [<c06a138c>] (__ieee80211_tx+0x6c/0x130) [ 5668.775970] [<c06a138c>] (__ieee80211_tx) from [<c06a3dbc>] (ieee80211_tx+0xdc/0x104) [ 5668.776367] [<c06a3dbc>] (ieee80211_tx) from [<c06a4af0>] (__ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x454/0x8c8) [ 5668.776824] [<c06a4af0>] (__ieee80211_subif_start_xmit) from [<c06a4f94>] (ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x30/0x2fc) [ 5668.777343] [<c06a4f94>] (ieee80211_subif_start_xmit) from [<c0578848>] (dev_hard_start_xmit+0x80/0x118) ... by adding the missing spin_lock_init(). Reported-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hi,
Trying to do:
drmModeAtomicCommit(drm.fd, req, DRM_MODE_PAGE_FLIP_EVENT|DRM_MODE_PAGE_FLIP_ASYNC, &pipe);
results on synchronous drmModeAtomicCommit() call: it returns when pageflip is done, instead of returning immediately as it is supposed to do.
So I was wondering if asynchronous atomic pageflipping is supposed to be working already with this KMS/DRM driver or not.
If it's not, I could implement my own thread, but having this block in the main thread is not desired at all for CPU-intensive emulation: we don't have CPU time to waste waiting for vsync.
But I would like to know if it's supposed to be working already.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: