-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TestV2 for patch model purpose #7
base: core-mergepatch-proto2
Are you sure you want to change the base?
TestV2 for patch model purpose #7
Conversation
public class TestV2ClientTest | ||
{ | ||
[Test] | ||
public async Task PathTestAsync() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this be PatchTest? I just want to make sure I understand the intention of this test and what it is trying to illustrate.
// TODO: was there a good way to get RequestContext without creating it new? | ||
RequestContext context = new() { CancellationToken = cancellationToken }; | ||
|
||
Response response = await PatchAsync(testV2.Key, content, context).ConfigureAwait(false); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How do you know that testV2.Key will have a value if it is not required by the model constructor?
{ | ||
// RequiredProperty could not set | ||
TestV2 testV2 = new TestV2(); | ||
testV2.Key = "key"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we add "key" to the model after it is constructed, it will be added to the request body payload. I think this is incorrect - a PATCH operation should not allow you to change the unique id of a resource.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I opened up an issue to discuss Azure/autorest.csharp#3640
/// public TestV2 CreateEmptyTestV2() | ||
/// just for patch usage. | ||
/// </summary> | ||
public TestV2() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This should require any required properties.
/// @visibility("read") | ||
/// readOnlyProperty: string; // Add this propery to differentiate request from response. | ||
/// optionalProperty?: string; | ||
/// requiredProperty: int32; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should understand why this property is required for GET and PUT but not for PATCH. I don't think we have a good foundation for this question yet.
All SDK Contribution checklist:
This checklist is used to make sure that common guidelines for a pull request are followed.
Draft
mode if it is:General Guidelines and Best Practices
Testing Guidelines
SDK Generation Guidelines
*.csproj
andAssemblyInfo.cs
files have been updated with the new version of the SDK. Please double check nuget.org current release version.Additional management plane SDK specific contribution checklist:
Note: Only applies to
Microsoft.Azure.Management.[RP]
orAzure.ResourceManager.[RP]
Management plane SDK Troubleshooting
If this is very first SDK for a services and you are adding new service folders directly under /SDK, please add
new service
label and/or contact assigned reviewer.If the check fails at the
Verify Code Generation
step, please ensure:generate.ps1/cmd
to generate this PR instead of callingautorest
directly.Please pay attention to the @microsoft.csharp version output after running
generate.ps1
. If it is lower than current released version (2.3.82), please run it again as it should pull down the latest version.Note: We have recently updated the PSH module called by
generate.ps1
to emit additional data. This would help reduce/eliminate the Code Verification check error. Please run following command:Old outstanding PR cleanup
Please note:
If PRs (including draft) has been out for more than 60 days and there are no responses from our query or followups, they will be closed to maintain a concise list for our reviewers.