-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 91
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unflatmap community.network #482
Conversation
bot_skip |
@Ompragash @Andersson007 it's basically up to you how you want to proceed with this. For community.general, I will merge the corresponding PR (ansible-collections/community.general#5461) as soon as CI passes (and there are no comments) and release a 6.0.0a1 version with it, and if there's no bad surprise the plan is to include it in next Monday's community.general 6.0.0 release. |
Note that merging this will introduce conflicts to probably all other PRs. If you merge this, here are some messages you can write into these PRs (I added similar messages depending on the situation to all community.general PRs that modified/added modules):
|
@felixfontein thanks for working on this! So what should we do to be in time:
UPDATE: instead ^, we can just follow https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/devel/community/collection_contributors/collection_release_with_branches.html#releasing-major-collection-versions |
@Andersson007 thanks! |
SUMMARY
See ansible-community/community-topics#147. At today's community meeting we (who were present) informally agreed to make community.general and community.network flat (however you want to call it).
ISSUE TYPE
COMPONENT NAME
collection