Fix dict modifying error #169
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
felixfontein
added
the
backport-1
|
This was crashing the tests while working on #168. |
Backport to stable-1: 💚 backport PR created✅ Backport PR branch: Backported as #170 🤖 @patchback |
patchback bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2023
(cherry picked from commit c2a176d)
felixfontein
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 21, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The construct
is dangerous: if
foois adefaultdict, you end up with a new entry, instead of theexcepthandler being executed. In case of docs augmentation, this can lead to a crash if a seealso without description is present for a non-existing plugin/module.