Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency eslint to v9.24.0 #215

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 13, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Mar 21, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
eslint (source) 9.22.0 -> 9.24.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

eslint/eslint (eslint)

v9.24.0

Compare Source

v9.23.0

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/eslint-monorepo branch from 6d100d8 to 145dec7 Compare April 1, 2025 11:33
@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency eslint to v9.23.0 chore(deps): update dependency eslint to v9.24.0 Apr 4, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/eslint-monorepo branch from 145dec7 to 1d500fc Compare April 4, 2025 21:41
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/eslint-monorepo branch from 1d500fc to f77c9e9 Compare April 8, 2025 11:40
@ansidev ansidev merged commit bf6093d into develop Apr 13, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant