Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/custom type field #532

Merged
merged 44 commits into from
Oct 24, 2022
Merged

Feature/custom type field #532

merged 44 commits into from
Oct 24, 2022

Conversation

cbellot000
Copy link
Contributor

@cbellot000 cbellot000 commented Oct 6, 2022

The CustomTypeField is a new entity available with Ansys 2023R1, it represents a simulation data container with each unitary data being of a custom type.
The CustomTypeField gives the ability to choose the most optimized unitary data type for a given usage, and hence, allows to optimize memory usage.

@cbellot000 cbellot000 added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 6, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 6, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #532 (f68c5d4) into master (f285b81) will increase coverage by 0.20%.
The diff coverage is 96.51%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #532      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.87%   87.08%   +0.20%     
==========================================
  Files          67       68       +1     
  Lines        7263     7455     +192     
==========================================
+ Hits         6310     6492     +182     
- Misses        953      963      +10     

@cbellot000 cbellot000 requested review from PProfizi and rlagha October 12, 2022 06:26
@cbellot000 cbellot000 requested a review from anslpa October 12, 2022 06:26
@cbellot000 cbellot000 merged commit e5e2b91 into master Oct 24, 2022
@cbellot000 cbellot000 deleted the feature/custom_type_field branch October 24, 2022 06:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants