Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: use codecov/codecov-action #191

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 13, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Layouwen
Copy link
Contributor

@Layouwen Layouwen commented Aug 13, 2024

ant-design/ant-design#50387

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved reliability and stability of the CI workflow with updated action versions.
    • Enhanced test coverage reporting with integration of Codecov.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Simplified command for running tests to avoid potential issues with script execution.
  • Chores

    • Updated Node.js version and caching actions for better performance and efficiency.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 13, 2024

Walkthrough

The updates to the GitHub Actions workflow enhance the configuration by upgrading action versions, streamlining event triggers, and refining testing processes. Notably, the workflow now uses the latest versions of checkout, setup-node, and cache actions, while switching to Node.js version 20. The testing command has been clarified, and coverage reporting has been improved by integrating Codecov. These changes aim to boost stability, performance, and reliability in the CI pipeline.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/workflows/main.yml - Updated actions/checkout from master to v4
- Updated actions/setup-node from v1 to v4 and Node.js version from 16 to 20
- Updated actions/cache from v2 to v4
- Changed test command from npm run coverage && bash <(curl -s https://codecov.io/bash) to npm test -- --coverage
- Added coverage upload step using codecov/codecov-action@v4

Poem

🐇 In the garden of code, we hop with delight,
Upgrading our tools, making everything bright.
With Node.js twenty, we leap and we bound,
Testing and coverage, our joy knows no bound.
So here’s to the changes, let’s cheer and rejoice,
For a smoother workflow, we all have a voice! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 19d1bc5 and e572dac.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/main.yml (5 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (17)
.github/workflows/main.yml (17)

3-3: LGTM: Simplified event triggers.

The on directive is now more concise, improving readability.


10-10: LGTM: Updated checkout action version.

Switching to v4 ensures stability and predictability.


17-17: LGTM: Updated cache action version.

The update to v4 likely enhances cache management.


23-23: LGTM: Added --ignore-scripts to npm install.

Prevents execution of unnecessary scripts in CI.


34-34: LGTM: Updated node_modules cache action version.

Ensure cache keys and paths are correctly configured.


47-47: LGTM: Consistent checkout action version in lint job.

Ensures stability across jobs.


50-50: LGTM: Consistent cache action version in lint job.

Ensures stability across jobs.


56-56: LGTM: Consistent node_modules cache action version in lint job.

Ensures stability across jobs.


70-70: LGTM: Consistent checkout action version in compile job.

Ensures stability across jobs.


73-73: LGTM: Consistent cache action version in compile job.

Ensures stability across jobs.


79-79: LGTM: Consistent node_modules cache action version in compile job.

Ensures stability across jobs.


93-93: LGTM: Consistent checkout action version in coverage job.

Ensures stability across jobs.


96-96: LGTM: Consistent cache action version in coverage job.

Ensures stability across jobs.


102-102: LGTM: Consistent node_modules cache action version in coverage job.

Ensures stability across jobs.


111-113: LGTM: Added Codecov action for coverage reporting.

Ensure that the CODECOV_TOKEN is securely managed in secrets.


12-14: LGTM: Updated setup-node action and Node.js version.

Ensure compatibility with Node.js 20 across the codebase.


108-108: LGTM: Updated test command for clarity.

Ensure that --coverage is supported by the test setup.

Verification successful

Coverage support confirmed in test setup.

The package.json includes a coverage script using vitest, and the @vitest/coverage-c8 dependency confirms that coverage reporting is supported. The change to use npm test -- --coverage is appropriate.

  • package.json: "coverage": "vitest run --coverage"
  • package.json: "@vitest/coverage-c8": "^0.31.0"
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify support for --coverage option in test setup.

# Test: Search for test configuration. Expect: Coverage support is enabled.
rg --type js --type ts 'coverage' -A 3

Length of output: 38


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for coverage configuration in package.json and common test config files.

# Check package.json for scripts or dependencies related to coverage
rg '"scripts"' -A 10 package.json
rg '"devDependencies"' -A 10 package.json
rg '"dependencies"' -A 10 package.json

# Check for common test configuration files for coverage settings
fd -e json -e js | xargs rg 'coverage'

Length of output: 1405

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.06%. Comparing base (71e8f97) to head (e572dac).
Report is 10 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #191      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.36%   95.06%   +0.70%     
==========================================
  Files          29       33       +4     
  Lines        2661     2880     +219     
  Branches      398      455      +57     
==========================================
+ Hits         2511     2738     +227     
+ Misses        150      142       -8     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants