Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: make the agent parameter optional to support data management functionality using only useXChat #271

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 29, 2024

Conversation

YumoImer
Copy link
Collaborator

@YumoImer YumoImer commented Nov 29, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 新功能

    • 更新了useXChat组件的文档,明确了agent属性在使用onRequest方法时的必要性。
  • 错误修复

    • 新增测试用例以验证在未提供有效代理时调用onRequest方法的错误处理。
  • 文档

    • 更新了XChatConfig类型中agent属性的描述,强调其在特定情况下为必需项。

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 29, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

此拉取请求对useXChat钩子的测试套件和文档进行了多项修改。测试中新增了一个用例,以验证在没有有效代理时调用onRequest方法会抛出错误。同时,XChatConfig接口中的agent属性从必需更改为可选,确保在未提供代理的情况下仍能配置。文档也更新了对agent属性的描述,明确指出在使用onRequest方法时该参数是必需的。

Changes

文件路径 变更摘要
components/useXChat/tests/index.test.tsx 新增测试用例以验证在没有代理时调用onRequest方法会抛出错误。保持了对requestPlaceholderrequestFallback的现有测试。
components/useXChat/index.en-US.md 更新agent属性的描述,明确其在使用onRequest方法时为必需。
components/useXChat/index.ts XChatConfig接口中的agent属性从必需更改为可选,并在onRequest函数中添加错误处理。
components/useXChat/index.zh-CN.md 更新agent属性的描述,明确其在使用onRequest方法时为必需。

Possibly related PRs

  • [test: coverage #72] 该PR涉及对useXChat钩子中onRequest方法的错误处理的更改,与XChatConfig接口中agent属性的修改相关,均关注于确保提供正确的参数以增强组件的健壮性。

Poem

在兔子窝里欢声笑,
使用XChat真是妙。
代理可选不再愁,
错误处理更周到。
测试用例新添彩,
代码清晰如月照。 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 29, 2024

Preview is ready

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 29, 2024

Bundle Report

Bundle size has no change ✅

Copy link

Deploying ant-design-x with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: edcef1d
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://7bdb1fd1.ant-design-x.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://refactor-use-x-chat.ant-design-x.pages.dev

View logs

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.13%. Comparing base (3134ca4) to head (edcef1d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #271      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.12%   91.13%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          66       66              
  Lines        1420     1422       +2     
  Branches      363      379      +16     
==========================================
+ Hits         1294     1296       +2     
  Misses        126      126              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
components/useXChat/index.zh-CN.md (1)

38-38: 文档描述清晰准确,建议稍作优化

当前描述准确地反映了 agent 参数的可选性和使用场景。为了使文档更加清晰,建议补充以下内容:

-| agent | 通过 `useXAgent` 生成的 `agent`,当使用 `onRequest` 方法时, `agent` 参数是必需的。 | XAgent | - |  |
+| agent | 通过 `useXAgent` 生成的 `agent`。可选参数,但当使用 `onRequest` 方法时必需提供。用于处理对话请求和响应。 | XAgent | - |  |
components/useXChat/index.en-US.md (1)

39-39: 建议完善 agent 参数的文档说明

当前描述仅说明了使用 onRequest 方法时需要 agent 参数,建议补充以下信息:

  1. 明确说明 agent 参数是可选的
  2. 说明在哪些场景下可以不提供 agent 参数

建议修改为:

-| agent | `agent` parameter is required when using the `onRequest` method in an agent generated by `useXAgent`. | XAgent | - |  |
+| agent | Optional. An agent generated by `useXAgent`. Required only when using the `onRequest` method. When performing basic data management without API requests, this parameter can be omitted. | XAgent | - |  |
components/useXChat/__tests__/index.test.tsx (1)

221-231: 建议增加可选 agent 参数的正向测试用例

当前的测试用例很好地验证了缺少 agent 时的错误处理,但建议添加以下测试场景:

  1. 验证不使用 onRequest 时可以正常初始化 useXChat
  2. 验证后续添加 agent 时能否正常工作
  3. 测试数据管理相关功能在没有 agent 时的表现

建议添加如下测试用例:

it('should work without agent for basic data management', () => {
  const { result } = renderHook(() =>
    useXChat({
      defaultMessages: [{ message: 'Hello' }],
    }),
  );
  
  expect(result.current.parsedMessages).toEqual([
    expect.objectContaining({
      message: 'Hello',
      status: 'local',
    }),
  ]);
});
components/useXChat/index.ts (1)

131-134: 建议改进错误处理的清晰度

当前的错误处理逻辑正确,但建议:

  1. 添加 JSDoc 注释说明 onRequest 方法需要 agent
  2. 在错误信息中更明确地说明使用场景

建议如下修改:

+ /**
+  * 发送请求到 agent
+  * @param message 要发送的消息
+  * @throws {Error} 当未配置 agent 时将抛出错误
+  */
  const onRequest = useEvent((message: AgentMessage) => {
    if (!agent)
      throw new Error(
-       'The agent parameter is required when using the onRequest method in an agent generated by useXAgent.',
+       '使用 onRequest 方法时必须配置 agent 参数。如果只需要管理消息,可以使用其他方法。',
      );
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3134ca4 and edcef1d.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • components/useXChat/__tests__/index.test.tsx (2 hunks)
  • components/useXChat/index.en-US.md (1 hunks)
  • components/useXChat/index.ts (2 hunks)
  • components/useXChat/index.zh-CN.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/useXChat/__tests__/index.test.tsx (1)

2-2: 导入更改看起来不错!

新增的 renderHook 导入与测试用例的需求相符,并且正确地与其他测试工具一起导入。

components/useXChat/index.ts (1)

24-24: 接口变更提醒:agent 参数现在为可选

这是一个破坏性更改,请确保:

  1. 所有依赖 XChatConfig 的代码都已更新
  2. 文档中已清楚说明此变更
✅ Verification successful

接口变更已得到适当处理

根据验证结果:

  1. 文档已经正确更新,清楚说明了 agent 参数在使用 onRequest 方法时才是必需的
  2. 测试用例已包含了无 agent 场景的错误处理
  3. 代码库中没有其他直接依赖 XChatConfig 的地方

这个破坏性变更已经得到了充分的文档说明和测试覆盖,可以安全地进行。

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# 检查代码库中是否有其他地方直接使用了 XChatConfig
rg "XChatConfig" --type typescript

Length of output: 69


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for XChatConfig usage in all files
rg "XChatConfig"

# Also search for files that might be importing from useXChat
rg "from ['\"].*useXChat"

Length of output: 978


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check test file content to understand usage
cat components/useXChat/__tests__/index.test.tsx

# Check documentation content
cat components/useXChat/index.zh-CN.md

Length of output: 8155

Copy link

size-limit report 📦

Path Size
dist/antdx.min.js 40.52 KB (+41 B 🔺)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants