Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: refine useTypedEffect #478

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 16, 2025
Merged

feat: refine useTypedEffect #478

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 16, 2025

Conversation

kxcy001123
Copy link
Contributor

@kxcy001123 kxcy001123 commented Jan 15, 2025

使用ref代替state,useEffect中的依赖更清晰一些

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • 重构
    • 优化了 useTypedEffect 钩子的性能,通过使用 ref 替代状态变量来跟踪先前的内容。
    • 改进了内容处理的方式,减少不必要的重新渲染。

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 15, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

概述

步骤说明

本次更改主要涉及 useTypedEffect 钩子中内容追踪方式的重构,从使用状态变量转变为使用引用(ref)来管理先前的内容。这一变更旨在优化性能并减少不必要的重新渲染。

变更

文件 变更摘要
components/bubble/hooks/useTypedEffect.ts prevContent 从状态变量替换为 prevContentRef,通过 ref 存储和访问先前内容

诗歌

🐰 代码兔轻跳,性能路上闪光
ref 替代 state,效率更加强
无声无息间,优化悄然来
兔子微笑看,代码如诗行


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7fb38dd and e0f7f6f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/bubble/hooks/useTypedEffect.ts (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • components/bubble/hooks/useTypedEffect.ts

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 15, 2025

Preview is ready

Copy link

Walkthrough

此PR通过使用useRef替代useState来优化useTypedEffect钩子函数,使得useEffect中的依赖关系更加清晰。具体来说,prevContent的状态管理从useState改为useRef,以减少不必要的渲染。

Changes

文件 概要
components/bubble/hooks/useTypedEffect.ts 使用useRef替代useState来管理prevContent,优化了依赖关系并减少了不必要的渲染。

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
components/bubble/hooks/useTypedEffect.ts (1)

29-29: 建议优化类型检查逻辑

当前的实现需要多次进行类型检查。考虑将类型检查提取到一个单独的变量中,以提高代码的可读性。

-    } else if (isString(content) && isString(prevContentRef.current) && content.indexOf(prevContentRef.current) !== 0) {
+    } else {
+      const isContentString = isString(content);
+      const isPrevContentString = isString(prevContentRef.current);
+      if (isContentString && isPrevContentString && content.indexOf(prevContentRef.current) !== 0) {
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e4544ec and 7fb38dd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • components/bubble/hooks/useTypedEffect.ts (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/bubble/hooks/useTypedEffect.ts (2)

19-19: 使用 ref 替代 state 是个很好的改进!

使用 useRef 来存储前一个内容是更好的选择,因为它不会触发不必要的重新渲染,同时保持了正确的类型注解。


32-32: ref 更新位置恰当!

useLayoutEffect 中更新 ref 的值是正确的选择,这确保了在下一次渲染前同步更新前一个内容的引用。

@kxcy001123
Copy link
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai review

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 16, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 16, 2025

Bundle Report

Bundle size has no change ✅

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 16, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.45%. Comparing base (e4544ec) to head (e0f7f6f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #478   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.45%   91.45%           
=======================================
  Files          67       67           
  Lines        1462     1462           
  Branches      385      385           
=======================================
  Hits         1337     1337           
  Misses        125      125           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@YumoImer YumoImer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

感谢贡献!

@YumoImer YumoImer merged commit 5380eb5 into ant-design:main Jan 16, 2025
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants