-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 412
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PostgreSQL 17 not supported #2111
Comments
@JamesInform Right now, PG 17 isn't in our roadmap. This could change in the future, but due to current resources, it is considered lower priority. |
@JamesInform I created a PR (2118) to resolve this issue. Currently there is no separate branch for branch for PG17, so I added PG17 version number check. @jrgemignani do we have a plan when should be create a separate branch, or who could create separate branch, or should this PR merged to master as is? |
It's not ready for PG17 yet. Running the regression tests against PG17:
AGE is one of the last PostgreSQL packages in Debian not yet supporting PG17 yet, so getting this fixed would be appreciated. Thanks. |
This is the problem with attempting to add fixes to a version (PG16 in this case) to allow it to run on another version (PG17 in this case) without checking to see if it actually fixes the newer version. I mistakenly assumed that this was done. |
@JamesInform @df7cb Currently, there isn't an eta for, nor a roadmap to, an Apache AGE version for PG17 or any continuing support. The core R&D team that was driving Apache AGE (paid to work on this project) was eliminated earlier this month. This means that future features, updates, bug fixes, etc. will be at a lot slower pace, if at all. Unfortunately, I cannot coerce or hold volunteers to any particular schedule. |
I was thinking of closing this issue, but I will leave it open for comments or inquiries. |
@jrgemignani thanks for the honest info. |
@jrgemignani thanks for the review. I agree that PR only fixed the compilation problem mention in the ticket but does not cover the whole PG 17 support. I will see if i can come up with full support. Based on the change we can see if it needs a separate branch for PG 17 or not. I will update here. |
This means I have to drop postgresql-age from the upcoming Alpine Linux v3.21. :( |
AGE doesn't support PostgreSQL 17 yet and it's not even on the roadmap. apache/age#2111
Hi, |
@uhayat works excellently, thanks! https://pgdgbuild.dus.dg-i.net/job/postgresql-16-age-binaries/12/ (PG16+17, despite the name) |
@df7cb nice to see that. |
Hi all
I built age for PostgreSQL 17. Basically compiling worked without errors.
But when I try to create the extension I get the following error:
When will a PostgreSQL 17 compatible version of age be available?
Cheers,
James
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: