Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Status of testing Providers that were prepared on August 29, 2023 #33875

Closed
33 of 34 tasks
eladkal opened this issue Aug 29, 2023 · 12 comments
Closed
33 of 34 tasks

Status of testing Providers that were prepared on August 29, 2023 #33875

eladkal opened this issue Aug 29, 2023 · 12 comments
Labels
kind:meta High-level information important to the community testing status Status of testing releases

Comments

@eladkal
Copy link
Contributor

eladkal commented Aug 29, 2023

Body

I have a kind request for all the contributors to the latest provider packages release.
Could you please help us to test the RC versions of the providers?

The guidelines on how to test providers can be found in

Verify providers by contributors

Let us know in the comment, whether the issue is addressed.

Those are providers that require testing as there were some substantial changes introduced:

Provider cncf.kubernetes: 7.5.0rc2

Provider microsoft.azure: 6.3.0rc2

All users involved in the PRs:
@amoghrajesh @eumiro @fdemiane @LipuFei @mati-o @potiuk @SamWheating @phanikumv @pankajastro @arjunanan6 @Owen-CH-Leung @ephraimbuddy @Taragolis @Lee-W @hussein-awala

Committer

  • I acknowledge that I am a maintainer/committer of the Apache Airflow project.
@eladkal eladkal added kind:meta High-level information important to the community testing status Status of testing releases labels Aug 29, 2023
airflow-oss-bot added a commit to astronomer/astronomer-providers that referenced this issue Aug 29, 2023
@ephraimbuddy
Copy link
Contributor

Verified the changes in #33851 and #33457

@Lee-W
Copy link
Member

Lee-W commented Aug 30, 2023

Verified #33716, #33467, #33433, #33493, #33469, #33436, #33653

@LipuFei
Copy link
Contributor

LipuFei commented Aug 30, 2023

Verified #33652

@fdemiane
Copy link
Contributor

Verified #33500

@pankajastro
Copy link
Member

#33627, #33598 and #33696 looks good

@Owen-CH-Leung
Copy link
Contributor

Verified #33306 , #33779 . Works as expected

@amoghrajesh
Copy link
Contributor

Verified #33378 #33379 #33381, no regressions from the last time. They work as expected.

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented Aug 30, 2023

Checked #33731. all good.

@arjunanan6
Copy link
Contributor

Check #33314 and it's working as expected.

@hussein-awala
Copy link
Member

Checked my changes, all looks good.

@mati-o
Copy link
Contributor

mati-o commented Aug 31, 2023

Checked #33604, works as expected 🚀

@eladkal
Copy link
Contributor Author

eladkal commented Sep 1, 2023

Thank you everyone.
Providers are released
I invite everyone to help improve providers for the next release, a list of open issues can be found here.

@eladkal eladkal closed this as completed Sep 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind:meta High-level information important to the community testing status Status of testing releases
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests