Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#13081 add note block to 2.x migration docs #13094

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 21, 2020
Merged

Conversation

whatnick
Copy link
Contributor

@whatnick whatnick commented Dec 15, 2020

closes: #13081

Added 2.x upgrading note in the OAuth section. Affects 1.10.14 bridge release as well. Auto-upgrade in our environment to 1.10.14 caused a minor OAuth2 login downtime. We will create a note in the official helm-chart repo as well for the secret_key to be highlighted similar to the fernet_key.

@boring-cyborg
Copy link

boring-cyborg bot commented Dec 15, 2020

Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check our Contribution Guide (https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.rst)
Here are some useful points:

  • Pay attention to the quality of your code (flake8, pylint and type annotations). Our pre-commits will help you with that.
  • In case of a new feature add useful documentation (in docstrings or in docs/ directory). Adding a new operator? Check this short guide Consider adding an example DAG that shows how users should use it.
  • Consider using Breeze environment for testing locally, it’s a heavy docker but it ships with a working Airflow and a lot of integrations.
  • Be patient and persistent. It might take some time to get a review or get the final approval from Committers.
  • Please follow ASF Code of Conduct for all communication including (but not limited to) comments on Pull Requests, Mailing list and Slack.
  • Be sure to read the Airflow Coding style.
    Apache Airflow is a community-driven project and together we are making it better 🚀.
    In case of doubts contact the developers at:
    Mailing List: dev@airflow.apache.org
    Slack: https://s.apache.org/airflow-slack

@@ -352,7 +359,7 @@ respect to the Kubernetes Executor. This is called out below for users of the Ku

**Upgrade KubernetesExecutor settings**

*The KubernetesExecutor Will No Longer Read from the airflow.cfg for Base Pod Configurations.*
*The KubernetesExecutor Will t` Longer Read from the airflow.cfg for Base Pod Configurations.*
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

typo!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks fixed.

Copy link
Member

@ashb ashb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This doesn't need

docs/apache-airflow/upgrading-to-2.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Tisham Dhar <whatnickd@gmail.com>
@whatnick whatnick requested a review from ashb December 16, 2020 19:24
@github-actions github-actions bot added the okay to merge It's ok to merge this PR as it does not require more tests label Dec 16, 2020
@github-actions
Copy link

The PR is likely ready to be merged. No tests are needed as no important environment files, nor python files were modified by it. However, committers might decide that full test matrix is needed and add the 'full tests needed' label. Then you should rebase it to the latest master or amend the last commit of the PR, and push it with --force-with-lease.

Co-authored-by: Kaxil Naik <kaxilnaik@gmail.com>
@whatnick whatnick requested a review from kaxil December 17, 2020 06:19
@whatnick
Copy link
Contributor Author

The PR is likely ready to be merged. No tests are needed as no important environment files, nor python files were modified by it. However, committers might decide that full test matrix is needed and add the 'full tests needed' label. Then you should rebase it to the latest master or amend the last commit of the PR, and push it with --force-with-lease.

Is this ready to merge should I perform the rebase activity or wait a bit more for a final approval from @kaxil

@kaxil kaxil merged commit 872350b into apache:master Dec 21, 2020
@boring-cyborg
Copy link

boring-cyborg bot commented Dec 21, 2020

Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request!

@whatnick whatnick deleted the oauth2-docs branch December 21, 2020 23:32
kaxil pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind:documentation okay to merge It's ok to merge this PR as it does not require more tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

OAuth2 login process is not stateless
4 participants