-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix dag warning endpoint permissions #34355
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -18,17 +18,19 @@ | |
|
||
from typing import TYPE_CHECKING | ||
|
||
from flask import g | ||
from sqlalchemy import select | ||
|
||
from airflow.api_connexion import security | ||
from airflow.api_connexion.exceptions import PermissionDenied | ||
from airflow.api_connexion.parameters import apply_sorting, check_limit, format_parameters | ||
from airflow.api_connexion.schemas.dag_warning_schema import ( | ||
DagWarningCollection, | ||
dag_warning_collection_schema, | ||
) | ||
from airflow.models.dagwarning import DagWarning as DagWarningModel | ||
from airflow.security import permissions | ||
from airflow.utils.db import get_query_count | ||
from airflow.utils.airflow_flask_app import get_airflow_app | ||
from airflow.utils.session import NEW_SESSION, provide_session | ||
|
||
if TYPE_CHECKING: | ||
|
@@ -57,12 +59,20 @@ def get_dag_warnings( | |
allowed_filter_attrs = ["dag_id", "warning_type", "message", "timestamp"] | ||
query = select(DagWarningModel) | ||
if dag_id: | ||
if not get_airflow_app().appbuilder.sm.can_read_dag(dag_id, g.user): | ||
raise PermissionDenied(detail=f"User not allowed to access this DAG: {dag_id}") | ||
query = query.where(DagWarningModel.dag_id == dag_id) | ||
if warning_type: | ||
query = query.where(DagWarningModel.warning_type == warning_type) | ||
total_entries = get_query_count(query, session=session) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. useless query, the count could be calculated from the list There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Actually not useless, because the is |
||
query = apply_sorting(query=query, order_by=order_by, allowed_attrs=allowed_filter_attrs) | ||
dag_warnings = session.scalars(query.offset(offset).limit(limit)).all() | ||
if not dag_id: | ||
dag_warnings = [ | ||
dag_warning | ||
for dag_warning in dag_warnings | ||
if get_airflow_app().appbuilder.sm.can_read_dag(dag_warning.dag_id, g.user) | ||
] | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Filtering should happen before limit, otherwise this would show a weird number of entries if some of the warnings are not viewable by the current user, even possibly an empty list. |
||
total_entries = len(dag_warnings) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think this is supposed to show the actual total, not the paginated value There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yeah. This is the total not paginated There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. My bad, I changed it but I forgot to push my commit. Just pushed it |
||
return dag_warning_collection_schema.dump( | ||
DagWarningCollection(dag_warnings=dag_warnings, total_entries=total_entries) | ||
) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I feel we should have the DAG permission in the decorator instead of handling this by ourselves. My vote would go to just adding(permissions.ACTION_CAN_READ, permissions.RESOURCE_DAG)
to the list of permissions.That should solve this. Assuming it's dag_ids instead of dag_id, then we can do as you're doing now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, I see that if dag_id is not provided, then it gets all dag warning, my bad.