Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add more precise description of masking sensitive field names #40512

Conversation

potiuk
Copy link
Member

@potiuk potiuk commented Jul 1, 2024


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

@potiuk potiuk requested a review from amoghrajesh July 1, 2024 05:34
@potiuk potiuk changed the title Add more precise description of maskiing sensitive field names Add more precise description of masking sensitive field names Jul 1, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@amoghrajesh amoghrajesh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NICE, LGTM +1

@potiuk potiuk merged commit dc03889 into apache:main Jul 1, 2024
38 checks passed
@potiuk potiuk deleted the add-more-precise-description-of-masking-sensitive-field-names branch July 1, 2024 06:10
@potiuk potiuk added this to the Airflow 2.9.3 milestone Jul 1, 2024
@utkarsharma2 utkarsharma2 added the type:doc-only Changelog: Doc Only label Jul 1, 2024
utkarsharma2 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2024
ephraimbuddy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2024
romsharon98 pushed a commit to romsharon98/airflow that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants