chore: unify handling of gcs paths in OpenLineage processes #44410
+82
−50
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Kacper Muda <mudakacper@gmail.com>
boring-cyborg
bot
added
area:providers
provider:google
eladkal
approved these changes
Nov 27, 2024
ArshiaZr
pushed a commit
to ArshiaZr/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 27, 2024
Signed-off-by: Kacper Muda <mudakacper@gmail.com>
LefterisXefteris
pushed a commit
to LefterisXefteris/airflow
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 5, 2025
Signed-off-by: Kacper Muda <mudakacper@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Each operator did the same GCS path processing to translate it to OpenLineage dataset name. This PR moves this logic to common utils function to make sure the lineage is consistent.
^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.