Skip to content

Conversation

@vincbeck
Copy link
Contributor

@vincbeck vincbeck commented Jan 7, 2025

Follow-up of #45441.

The Flask application in FAB provider should not use any Flask related resources from core Airflow. Otherwise, deleting the main Flask application in core Airflow when the legacy Airflow 2 is gone will be impossible.

This PR focus on the package airflow.api_connexion.


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

@vincbeck vincbeck merged commit 32dc9e8 into apache:main Jan 8, 2025
62 checks passed
@vincbeck vincbeck deleted the vincbeck/api_connexion branch January 8, 2025 15:59
dstandish pushed a commit to astronomer/airflow that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2025
HariGS-DB pushed a commit to HariGS-DB/airflow that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2025
got686-yandex pushed a commit to got686-yandex/airflow that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants