Skip to content

Conversation

@jscheffl
Copy link
Contributor

As I reviewed #46608 I noticed that there is a S101 exception noted for the example DAG.

This PR cleans this up.

@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added the provider:edge Edge Executor / Worker (AIP-69) / edge3 label Feb 15, 2025
@jscheffl jscheffl requested review from Copilot and potiuk February 15, 2025 22:21
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

@potiuk potiuk merged commit 4c031cb into apache:main Feb 15, 2025
62 checks passed
dantonbertuol pushed a commit to dantonbertuol/airflow that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2025
ntr pushed a commit to ntr/airflow that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2025
@jscheffl jscheffl deleted the bugfix/remove-assert-in-example-dag branch October 5, 2025 07:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

provider:edge Edge Executor / Worker (AIP-69) / edge3

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants