[v3-0-test] Move webserver config to fab provider (#50774) #50848
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
pierrejeambrun
requested review from
ashb,
bbovenzi,
bugraoz93,
ephraimbuddy,
gopidesupavan,
jason810496,
jscheffl,
potiuk,
rawwar,
ryanahamilton and
vincbeck
as code owners
boring-cyborg
bot
added
area:API
pierrejeambrun
force-pushed
the
backport-50774
branch
3 times, most recently
from
67f2c25 to
c8325f6
Compare
* Move webserver navbar config to fab provider * Remove x_frame_enabled config (cherry picked from commit 649309e)
pierrejeambrun
force-pushed
the
backport-50774
branch
from
c8325f6 to
8f18665
Compare
kaxil
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 3, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Move webserver navbar config to fab provider
Remove x_frame_enabled config
(cherry picked from commit 649309e)
^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments.