Skip to content

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link

The original PR #49978 that fixed generation of proper documentation for
standard provider examples added retrieval of the path by checking
import location for the standard provider. Instead we are now using
direct path to the provider.
(cherry picked from commit 13c6020)

Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk jarek@potiuk.com

…ath (#50843)

The original PR #49978 that fixed generation of proper documentation for
standard provider examples added retrieval of the path by checking
import location for the standard provider. Instead we are now using
direct path to the provider.
(cherry picked from commit 13c6020)

Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added the area:API Airflow's REST/HTTP API label May 21, 2025
@potiuk potiuk marked this pull request as ready for review May 21, 2025 10:21
@potiuk potiuk merged commit 38225c6 into v3-0-test May 21, 2025
65 of 66 checks passed
@potiuk potiuk deleted the backport-13c6020-v3-0-test branch May 21, 2025 12:40
kaxil pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2025
…ath (#50843) (#50877)

The original PR #49978 that fixed generation of proper documentation for
standard provider examples added retrieval of the path by checking
import location for the standard provider. Instead we are now using
direct path to the provider.
(cherry picked from commit 13c6020)

Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:API Airflow's REST/HTTP API

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant