Skip to content

Conversation

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

@potiuk potiuk commented Jul 23, 2025

The workflow run command validation had few places where the validation could be improved:

  • when you do not specify packages, the workflow has no idea what to build, so the list of packages should not be empty

  • when gh has an old version, some of the functionality might not work - we are checking gh version to check if it is old enough.


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments.

The workflow run command validation had few places where the
validation could be improved:

* when you do not specify packages, the workflow has no idea what
  to build, so the list of packages should not be empty

* when gh has an old version, some of the functionality might not
  work - we are checking gh version to check if it is old enough.
@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added area:dev-tools backport-to-v3-1-test Mark PR with this label to backport to v3-1-test branch labels Jul 23, 2025
@potiuk potiuk merged commit 0dc9105 into apache:main Jul 23, 2025
100 checks passed
@potiuk potiuk deleted the better-workflow-run-check branch July 23, 2025 21:56
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2025
The workflow run command validation had few places where the
validation could be improved:

* when you do not specify packages, the workflow has no idea what
  to build, so the list of packages should not be empty

* when gh has an old version, some of the functionality might not
  work - we are checking gh version to check if it is old enough.
(cherry picked from commit 0dc9105)

Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
@github-actions
Copy link

Backport successfully created: v3-0-test

Status Branch Result
v3-0-test PR Link

potiuk added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2025
#53688)

The workflow run command validation had few places where the
validation could be improved:

* when you do not specify packages, the workflow has no idea what
  to build, so the list of packages should not be empty

* when gh has an old version, some of the functionality might not
  work - we are checking gh version to check if it is old enough.
(cherry picked from commit 0dc9105)

Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:dev-tools backport-to-v3-1-test Mark PR with this label to backport to v3-1-test branch

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants