Skip to content

Conversation

@olegkachur-e
Copy link
Contributor

@olegkachur-e olegkachur-e commented Jul 24, 2025

To address the #50976 and rework the #49120, as suggested in the issue.

Closes: #50976


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments.

@plutaniano
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM. Thank you for addressing the issue.

@olegkachur-e olegkachur-e force-pushed the bq_postgress_op_fix branch from 8e571fa to 222b369 Compare July 28, 2025 15:26
To adress the apache#50976
and rework the apache#49120, as suggested in the issue.
@olegkachur-e olegkachur-e force-pushed the bq_postgress_op_fix branch from 222b369 to d011d3f Compare July 29, 2025 09:06
Copy link
Member

@potiuk potiuk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! Thank you !

@potiuk potiuk merged commit ce42e85 into apache:main Jul 30, 2025
75 checks passed
@olegkachur-e olegkachur-e deleted the bq_postgress_op_fix branch July 31, 2025 12:05
RoyLee1224 pushed a commit to RoyLee1224/airflow that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2025
To adress the apache#50976
and rework the apache#49120, as suggested in the issue.

Co-authored-by: Oleg Kachur <kachur@google.com>
ferruzzi pushed a commit to aws-mwaa/upstream-to-airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2025
To adress the apache#50976
and rework the apache#49120, as suggested in the issue.

Co-authored-by: Oleg Kachur <kachur@google.com>
fweilun pushed a commit to fweilun/airflow that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2025
To adress the apache#50976
and rework the apache#49120, as suggested in the issue.

Co-authored-by: Oleg Kachur <kachur@google.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:providers provider:google Google (including GCP) related issues provider:postgres

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

PostgresHook is ignoring custom adapters registered for dicts and lists

3 participants