Align GCS operator documentation headings with RST style

[KamranImaaz]

---

Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?

• Yes (please specify the tool below)

---

• Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information. Note: commit author/co-author name and email in commits become permanently public when merged.
• For fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
• When adding dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
• For significant user-facing changes create newsfragment: {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments.

[KamranImaaz]

@shahar1 Now all the Doc files in Operator's docs follow one heading font size for operators. Please have a look.

[shahar1]

Hey @KamranImaaz, specifically for updating the headings I'd prefer that you'll create a single PR to fix all sections of all related files at once, rather than multiple PRs. Please consider if you plan to create more PRs (no need to fix existing ones).

[KamranImaaz]

Hey Shahar I asked this question in the #61365 I thought raising seperate would be good. But since now all the Headings are covered there is nothing left to do. Sorry for the inconvinence caused. From Next time onwards when I encounter such situaution I will raise all of them in a single PR.

[shahar1]

Hey Shahar I asked this question in the #61365 I thought raising seperate would be good. But since now all the Headings are covered there is nothing left to do. Sorry for the inconvinence caused. From Next time onwards when I encounter such situaution I will raise all of them in a single PR.

No problem at all! I'll try to clarify -
If you make changes to multiple code parts of unrelated files, than it's better to do so in separate PRs, so if we encounter an issue in any of them - it would be easier to isolate the source of the issue.
If it's only updating style of sections in docs like in this case, and the changes have the same nature - I'd prefer that it will be in a single PR because it shouldn't affect any logic inside the code.
I hope that it makes sense - it's probably a matter of time and experience until you feel what is more suitable for each case.

[KamranImaaz]

Hey Shahar I asked this question in the #61365 I thought raising seperate would be good. But since now all the Headings are covered there is nothing left to do. Sorry for the inconvinence caused. From Next time onwards when I encounter such situaution I will raise all of them in a single PR.

No problem at all! I'll try to clarify - If you make changes to multiple code parts of unrelated files, than it's better to do so in separate PRs, so if we encounter an issue in any of them - it would be easier to isolate the source of the issue. If it's only updating style of sections in docs like in this case, and the changes have the same nature - I'd prefer that it will be in a single PR because it shouldn't affect any logic inside the code. I hope that it makes sense - it's probably a matter of time and experience until you feel what is more suitable for each case.

Yes Sure I will keep in mind this one. Thanks for always helping and suggesting me :)

[shahar1]

Hey Shahar I asked this question in the #61365 I thought raising seperate would be good. But since now all the Headings are covered there is nothing left to do. Sorry for the inconvinence caused. From Next time onwards when I encounter such situaution I will raise all of them in a single PR.

No problem at all! I'll try to clarify - If you make changes to multiple code parts of unrelated files, than it's better to do so in separate PRs, so if we encounter an issue in any of them - it would be easier to isolate the source of the issue. If it's only updating style of sections in docs like in this case, and the changes have the same nature - I'd prefer that it will be in a single PR because it shouldn't affect any logic inside the code. I hope that it makes sense - it's probably a matter of time and experience until you feel what is more suitable for each case.

Yes Sure I will keep in mind this one. Thanks for always helping and suggesting me :)

CI issues should have been fixed so you could merge from main - please note that there are issue probably related to the changes in this PR:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/21776944806/job/62835224588?pr=61578
https://github.com/apache/airflow/actions/runs/21776944806/job/62835224593?pr=61578

[KamranImaaz]

Okay Sure Shahar. I'll update you by tonight!!