[AMORO-2546] Upgrade paimon dependency to 0.7.0

[huyuanfeng2018]

Why are the changes needed?

Close #2546.

Brief change log

• Bump Paimon 0.5.0 to 0.7.0

How was this patch tested?

• Add some test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive cases if possible

• Add screenshots for manual tests if appropriate

• Run test locally before making a pull request

Documentation

• Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
• If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
1 out of 2 committers have signed the CLA.

✅ zhoujinsong
❌ huyuanfeng

---

huyuanfeng seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 9 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (9c397f8) 32.24% compared to head (89acbe9) 32.23%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files	Patch %	Lines
...arctic/server/dashboard/PaimonTableDescriptor.java	0.00%	9 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #2548      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     32.24%   32.23%   -0.01%     
- Complexity     4384     4385       +1     
============================================
  Files           589      589              
  Lines         49888    49892       +4     
  Branches       6618     6618              
============================================
- Hits          16084    16081       -3     
- Misses        32533    32538       +5     
- Partials       1271     1273       +2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
core	30.28% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
trino	50.93% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[baiyangtx]

The CI is failed. @huyuanfeng2018

[huyuanfeng2018]

This is caused by a bug in hive. The version we are using is 2.1.1, and this bug exists https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-15081?jql=project%20%3D%20HIVE

Need to consider upgrading hive dependencies to 2.3.9?
@baiyangtx cc

[zhoujinsong]

LGTM.