Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move optimizer init to optimizer crate #3692

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 3, 2022

Conversation

andygrove
Copy link
Member

Which issue does this PR close?

Closes #3524

Rationale for this change

We need the optimizer tests in the optimizer crate to run against the same set of rules that DataFusion actually uses.

What changes are included in this PR?

Move the list of rules to the optimizer crate.

Are there any user-facing changes?

@andygrove andygrove changed the title move optimizer init to optimizer crate Move optimizer init to optimizer crate Oct 3, 2022
@andygrove andygrove requested a review from alamb October 3, 2022 16:09
@github-actions github-actions bot added core Core DataFusion crate optimizer Optimizer rules labels Oct 3, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@alamb alamb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks wonderful to me -- thank you @andygrove

/// Create a new optimizer with the given rules
pub fn new(rules: Vec<Arc<dyn OptimizerRule + Send + Sync>>) -> Self {
pub fn with_rules(rules: Vec<Arc<dyn OptimizerRule + Send + Sync>>) -> Self {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❤️

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One thing that is odd now is that we pass a config into the constructor and also pass it into the optimize method - I plan to create a separate PR to see if we can change that.

    let mut config = OptimizerConfig::new().with_skip_failing_rules(false);
    let optimizer = Optimizer::new(&config);
    optimizer.optimize(&plan, &mut config, &observe)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah... we need to figure out what to do with this id generator first

@andygrove andygrove merged commit 6b282ec into apache:master Oct 3, 2022
@andygrove andygrove deleted the move-optimizer-init branch October 3, 2022 17:07
@ursabot
Copy link

ursabot commented Oct 3, 2022

Benchmark runs are scheduled for baseline = 8415368 and contender = 6b282ec. 6b282ec is a master commit associated with this PR. Results will be available as each benchmark for each run completes.
Conbench compare runs links:
[Skipped ⚠️ Benchmarking of arrow-datafusion-commits is not supported on ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2] ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2
[Skipped ⚠️ Benchmarking of arrow-datafusion-commits is not supported on test-mac-arm] test-mac-arm
[Skipped ⚠️ Benchmarking of arrow-datafusion-commits is not supported on ursa-i9-9960x] ursa-i9-9960x
[Skipped ⚠️ Benchmarking of arrow-datafusion-commits is not supported on ursa-thinkcentre-m75q] ursa-thinkcentre-m75q
Buildkite builds:
Supported benchmarks:
ec2-t3-xlarge-us-east-2: Supported benchmark langs: Python, R. Runs only benchmarks with cloud = True
test-mac-arm: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Python, R
ursa-i9-9960x: Supported benchmark langs: Python, R, JavaScript
ursa-thinkcentre-m75q: Supported benchmark langs: C++, Java

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core Core DataFusion crate optimizer Optimizer rules
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Consolidate optimizer passes in optimizer module for better testing
3 participants