Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix case of recursively nested lists #459

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 8, 2023
Merged

Fix case of recursively nested lists #459

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 8, 2023

Conversation

quinnj
Copy link
Member

@quinnj quinnj commented Jun 8, 2023

Fixes issue reported by @Moelf in #458.

The issue is we need to get the eltype from the recursively built child array instead of as a top-level translation of the current field type.

Fixes issue reported by @Moelf in #458.

The issue is we need to get the eltype from the recursively built
child array instead of as a top-level translation of the current field type.
@Moelf
Copy link
Contributor

Moelf commented Jun 8, 2023

thx for the swift fix

@quinnj quinnj mentioned this pull request Jun 8, 2023
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #459 (a988fb9) into main (f039a5e) will decrease coverage by 82.62%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #459       +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   87.55%   4.94%   -82.62%     
==========================================
  Files          26      25        -1     
  Lines        3271    3194       -77     
==========================================
- Hits         2864     158     -2706     
- Misses        407    3036     +2629     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/table.jl 0.00% <0.00%> (-92.50%) ⬇️

... and 23 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@Moelf
Copy link
Contributor

Moelf commented Jun 8, 2023

what happened to coverage 😆

@quinnj
Copy link
Member Author

quinnj commented Jun 8, 2023

what happened to coverage 😆

I think it's getting confused w/ ArrowTypes.jl CI jobs finishing first and then we're getting 0 coverage on Arrow.jl files from ArrowTypes tests.

@quinnj quinnj merged commit 074c7a7 into main Jun 8, 2023
@quinnj quinnj deleted the jq-458 branch June 8, 2023 15:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants