ci(python): Add cibuildwheel setup for Python wheels

[paleolimbot]

This PR adds a weekly/workflow dispatch job for building and testing Python wheels. This required a few housekeeping items:

• Versioning the python package. I used the approach from ADBC, which is a modified 'miniver'. Basically, just set the version as a string using a regex replace when needed.
• The bootstrap.py logic was updated to use a proper temporary directory
• Tests were updated to skip instead of fail when pyarrow/numpy are not available (because I can never remember which platforms they will or won't install on and the default cibuildwheel grid is large).
• I hadn't tested install from sdist, so a few files were missing from the manifest.

Two outstanding issues that don't necessarily need to be solved in this PR:

• The linux arm self-hosted runner not is not picking up the job? (config copied from https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/main/.github/workflows/go.yml#L46-L66 ). It's not the end of the world to not have linux/arm64 wheels but if we already have the runner set up it seems like a good time to make sure it works.
• At least one test doesn't pass on 32-bit Windows (already fixed in refactor(python): Document, prefix, and add reprs for C-wrapping classes #340). For now I just enabled the version tests to make sure everything built/linked properly.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: 5 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (38b5201) 88.08% compared to head (540999b) 87.20%.
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Files	Patch %	Lines
python/src/nanoarrow/_static_version.py	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
python/src/nanoarrow/_version.py	90.00%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #353      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.08%   87.20%   -0.89%     
==========================================
  Files          72        6      -66     
  Lines       11677      125   -11552     
==========================================
- Hits        10286      109   -10177     
+ Misses       1391       16    -1375     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[assignUser]

workflow looks good rest also looks sensible but my python is mid ^^

[jorisvandenbossche]

Looking good!

I added a whole bunch of comments, but many are also small nitpicks that are not crucial at all

[jorisvandenbossche]

We could also run in on every commit in main? (I agree it's certainly good to not let it run on every commit in every PR)

  push:
    branches:
      - main

[jorisvandenbossche]

BTW, we can build MacOS arm64 wheels here on github actions if we want (just not test them), that's what we do in other projects I am involved with

[jorisvandenbossche]

In fact, that's already happening (because you defined CIBW_ARCHS_MACOS to include both, I suppose)

[jorisvandenbossche]

We could also try emulation on github actions here for linux arm64 (given it's a small package, that might be possible and not too slow). Then we wouldn't need any other self-hosted runner or different CI platform.

[paleolimbot]

It took a second to figure it out, but it seems like the arm64 runner works!

[jorisvandenbossche]

Suggested change

	- name: Install cibuildwheel
	run: python -m pip install cibuildwheel==2.15.0
	- name: Build wheels
	run: |
	python -m cibuildwheel --output-dir wheelhouse python
	- name: Build wheels
	uses: pypa/cibuildwheel@v2.16.2

I am not sure why the cibuildwheel README shows the manual way, but the docs recommend using the action (https://cibuildwheel.readthedocs.io/en/stable/setup/#github-actions)

[paleolimbot]

I had to revert to the previous version because of the arm self-hosted runner (for which the stock install-python action won't work).

[jorisvandenbossche]

This isn't needed if you use the copied miniver helper?