Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Python] pandas internals: avoid using DatetimeTZBlock #38341

Closed
Tracked by #35081
jorisvandenbossche opened this issue Oct 19, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #38321
Closed
Tracked by #35081

[Python] pandas internals: avoid using DatetimeTZBlock #38341

jorisvandenbossche opened this issue Oct 19, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #38321
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@jorisvandenbossche jorisvandenbossche changed the title Avoid using DatetimeTZBlock [Python] pandas internals: avoid using DatetimeTZBlock Oct 19, 2023
@raulcd raulcd modified the milestones: 14.0.2, 15.0.0 Nov 28, 2023
jorisvandenbossche added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 8, 2024
…38321)

### Rationale for this change

This usage probably stems from a long time ago that it was required to specify the Block type, but nowadays it's good enough to just specify the dtype, and thus cutting down on our usage of internal pandas objects.

Part of #35081

* Closes: #38341

Authored-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
clayburn pushed a commit to clayburn/arrow that referenced this issue Jan 23, 2024
…lock (apache#38321)

### Rationale for this change

This usage probably stems from a long time ago that it was required to specify the Block type, but nowadays it's good enough to just specify the dtype, and thus cutting down on our usage of internal pandas objects.

Part of apache#35081

* Closes: apache#38341

Authored-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
dgreiss pushed a commit to dgreiss/arrow that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2024
…lock (apache#38321)

### Rationale for this change

This usage probably stems from a long time ago that it was required to specify the Block type, but nowadays it's good enough to just specify the dtype, and thus cutting down on our usage of internal pandas objects.

Part of apache#35081

* Closes: apache#38341

Authored-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
zanmato1984 pushed a commit to zanmato1984/arrow that referenced this issue Feb 28, 2024
…lock (apache#38321)

### Rationale for this change

This usage probably stems from a long time ago that it was required to specify the Block type, but nowadays it's good enough to just specify the dtype, and thus cutting down on our usage of internal pandas objects.

Part of apache#35081

* Closes: apache#38341

Authored-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants