-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ARROW-14897: [CI][C++] Upgrade Clang Tools to 12 from 8 #11786
Conversation
|
ef93600
to
e881881
Compare
@github-actions crossbow submit -g nightly |
Revision: e881881 Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-1210 |
@pitrou @lidavidm @cyb70289 @bkietz @westonpace You may be interested in this. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1
There are some mentions in dev docs about the clang version:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it'd be worth giving a heads-up on dev@, even though the diffs here are small/it seems we shouldn't have many conflicts.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This would be rather helpful for me. I had to disable clang on clion because it kept reordering the headers and I think IncludeBlocks: Preserve
is probably what I was missing so thanks for that 👍
It looks like the TravisCI failures are related. Googling suggests that maybe the TravisCI build host has out-of-date SSL root certificates and you might need to update libgnutls-openssl27 libgnutls30
in addition to ca-certificates
but that is kind of a shot in the dark based on this
@mbrobbel Good catch! I've updated documentations and they don't include the pinned version now. @lidavidm It makes sense. I've sent an e-mail: https://lists.apache.org/thread/bd3rkllwgsrnqmmsn9zn5wo3cmjdn2b4 @westonpace Thanks for the hint. I've fixed it. You may be interested in R related changes after the first push:
|
This is fantastic, thank you! There are a few places in Line 1205 in 736a69e
Line 1193 in 736a69e
|
26b67c7
to
8ab6937
Compare
@github-actions crossbow submit test-r-ubuntu-21.04 test-r-gcc-11 |
@jonkeane Good catch! I've removed them. |
Revision: 8ab6937 Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-1227
|
8ab6937
to
84aa717
Compare
84aa717
to
4665516
Compare
4665516
to
3ee8213
Compare
CI failures are unrelated. This is caused by https://packagemanager.rstudio.com/ . It returns 500. I'll merge this. |
Benchmark runs are scheduled for baseline = 9ec01da and contender = f36451f. f36451f is a master commit associated with this PR. Results will be available as each benchmark for each run completes. |
No description provided.