Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ARROW-1027: [Python] Allow negative indexing in fields/columns on pyarrow Table and Schema objects #686

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

cpcloud
Copy link
Contributor

@cpcloud cpcloud commented May 14, 2017

Negative indexing causes an interpreter segfault right now. After this PR, no segfaults, and reasonable error messages for out of bounds indexes.

Copy link
Member

@wesm wesm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1. Thanks @cpcloud!

@asfgit asfgit closed this in edfb2dc May 15, 2017
jeffknupp pushed a commit to jeffknupp/arrow that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2017
…rrow Table and Schema objects

Negative indexing causes an interpreter segfault right now. After this PR, no segfaults, and reasonable error messages for out of bounds indexes.

Author: Phillip Cloud <cpcloud@gmail.com>

Closes apache#686 from cpcloud/ARROW-1027 and squashes the following commits:

1bfcef4 [Phillip Cloud] ARROW-1027: [Python] Allow negative indexing in fields/columns on pyarrow Table and Schema objects
pcmoritz pushed a commit to pcmoritz/arrow that referenced this pull request Jun 11, 2017
…rrow Table and Schema objects

Negative indexing causes an interpreter segfault right now. After this PR, no segfaults, and reasonable error messages for out of bounds indexes.

Author: Phillip Cloud <cpcloud@gmail.com>

Closes apache#686 from cpcloud/ARROW-1027 and squashes the following commits:

1bfcef4 [Phillip Cloud] ARROW-1027: [Python] Allow negative indexing in fields/columns on pyarrow Table and Schema objects
@cpcloud cpcloud deleted the ARROW-1027 branch June 23, 2017 04:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants