Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ARROW-9222: [Format] Columnar.rst changes for removing validity bitmap from union types #7535

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

wesm
Copy link
Member

@wesm wesm commented Jun 24, 2020

See mailing list discussion.

@github-actions
Copy link

Thanks for opening a pull request!

Could you open an issue for this pull request on JIRA?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW

Then could you also rename pull request title in the following format?

ARROW-${JIRA_ID}: [${COMPONENT}] ${SUMMARY}

See also:

@wesm wesm changed the title [Format][DONOTMERGE] Columnar.rst changes for removing validity bitmap from union types ARROW-9222: [Format][DONOTMERGE] Columnar.rst changes for removing validity bitmap from union types Jun 29, 2020
@github-actions
Copy link

@wesm wesm changed the title ARROW-9222: [Format][DONOTMERGE] Columnar.rst changes for removing validity bitmap from union types ARROW-9222: [Format] Columnar.rst changes for removing validity bitmap from union types Jul 2, 2020
@wesm wesm force-pushed the union-no-validity branch from 5e096d4 to 493b4d3 Compare July 2, 2020 21:49
@wesm
Copy link
Member Author

wesm commented Jul 2, 2020

@wesm wesm closed this in 6df8620 Jul 2, 2020
@wesm wesm deleted the union-no-validity branch July 2, 2020 22:39
sgnkc pushed a commit to sgnkc/arrow that referenced this pull request Jul 6, 2020
…p from union types

See mailing list discussion.

Closes apache#7535 from wesm/union-no-validity

Authored-by: Wes McKinney <wesm@apache.org>
Signed-off-by: Wes McKinney <wesm@apache.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants