-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.5k
Fix generate sequence #35043
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Fix generate sequence #35043
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7b35574
added elements_per_period
liferoad 5baadcd
added one test
liferoad 413aff7
fix lint
liferoad db33dca
added test_run_generate_sequence_with_rate
liferoad 2f9e128
use beam.Row
liferoad 916348e
revert this back to dict
liferoad File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This Rate object already has the fields necessary (
elementsandseconds) to control elements per period. Can you check if this works?If it doesn't work, I think we can just remove Rate and introduce them as top-level fields
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i.e. something like
provider.GenerateSequence(start=0, rate={elements: 3, seconds: 1})I don't remember if "rate" is provided as a dict or a beam.Row()
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tested. The dict works well. I also added the test
test_run_generate_sequence_with_rate.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If the current Rate dict works then is there a need for this PR?
I don't think it makes sense to duplicate the API. Maybe we should keep the new rate test though
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The original idea is to create the similar syntax to
beam/sdks/java/core/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/GenerateSequence.java
Line 116 in f9dca88
rate, I am also fine with that.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#35108