Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] Clarify sponsorship in the footer #1020

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

brodycj
Copy link
Contributor

@brodycj brodycj commented Oct 10, 2019

Platforms affected

All

Motivation and Context

Existing sponsorship link which shows up on every page in our documentation goes to an ASF "sponsorship" page but it is not so clear that the sponsorship would go to non-coding activities. This is not in line with our needs for project sustainability (apache/cordova#163).

I think we should also direct people to the actual project sustainability issue (apache/cordova#163).

I am including "[BUG]" in the description since I think this is something that needs to be fixed in our documentation.

Description

Testing

TODO:

  • check that generated documentation renders correctly

Checklist

  • I've run the tests to see all new and existing tests pass
  • I added automated test coverage as appropriate for this change
  • Commit is prefixed with (platform) if this change only applies to one platform (e.g. (android))
  • If this Pull Request resolves an issue, I linked to the issue in the text above (and used the correct keyword to close issues using keywords)
  • I've updated the documentation if necessary

Copy link
Member

@janpio janpio left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Inappropriate.

Copy link
Member

@timbru31 timbru31 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unfortunately, I’m with Jan. The footer was good for the last couple of years and we should first discuss the matter and then update it.

@brodycj
Copy link
Contributor Author

brodycj commented Oct 15, 2019

Closing this one out for now. I would like to say a couple things for the record:

I continue to stand by all of the points I made in the motivation. I think this continues to be a pretty bad problem, if the "sponsorship" link cannot cover one of the most important pillars.

Some of the feedback seems to be a bit subjective.

I would definitely be happy to leave this up for discussion, if there is any way we can find a solution to the problem.

@jcesarmobile
Copy link
Member

We have been offered one sponsorship in 10 years, so I don't think this clarification is needed. Whoever wants to donate to Apache should read their sponsorship policy first, and if they want to fund development work should offer it directly to some developer.

@brodycj brodycj closed this Dec 19, 2019
@janpio janpio deleted the brodybits-patch-1 branch December 21, 2019 18:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants