ci(travis): add Xcode 10.2 & Xcode 11

[brodycj]

No description provided.

[janpio]

no need to test on Xcode 10.1 any more?

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #644 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #644   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   74.24%   74.24%           
=======================================
  Files          11       11           
  Lines        1833     1833           
=======================================
  Hits         1361     1361           
  Misses        472      472

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6d618c4...e3e59b8. Read the comment docs.

[brodycj]

Now keeping Xcode 10.1 on Node.js 10

[dpogue]

We're testing with Xcode 11 only now, closing due to conflicts.

[brodycj]

My work is now wasted since people continued updating without even considering this proposal. I did request quite a few reviewers on GitHub, evidently ignored. And I recall raising some other PRs that never got reviewed.

One thing is that it would have been nice to include Xcode 10.2 in Travis CI, as long as it can still keep working, like I proposed here.

[erisu]

@brodybits If you still want this merged in, change the target branch to 5.1.x.

If there were to be any future minors releases for the 5.x major, a new minor branch would need to be created based on 5.1.x. Same also applies with future patch releases, PRs would need to be merged into 5.1.x branch. Your changes in this PR can still be used to test those PRs that would be merged into that branch for any potential 5.x related releases.

[brodycj]

Thanks @erisu, I think you are right since cordova-ios is rightfully dropping Xcode pre-11 in master (for upcoming major release). If we do apply this change to 5.x branch, I think we should try to ensure little things such as comments that I added are as consistent as possible with master. I really don't have so much extra time to pay attention to this right now. Some other thoughts for the record:

I think I did overreact. My work was not really such a huge amount, and I do strongly favor the review process we follow to keep our repos as clean as possible. My apologies.

Documentation needs to be updated as well, as I already reported in apache/cordova-docs#1056.