-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 169
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: Add TPC-H test results #218
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #218 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 33.32% 33.32%
Complexity 768 768
=========================================
Files 107 107
Lines 37037 37037
Branches 8106 8106
=========================================
Hits 12341 12341
Misses 22099 22099
Partials 2597 2597 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm why a few queries are missing in the results? q1, q15, q17, q18
Ah, yeah, they are disabled because the outputs are different to Spark. But for these output files, we should generate them. Let me add them. |
Merged. Thanks. |
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
Rationale for this change
We have already added back TPC-DS query results in #77. This adds back TPC-H query results.
What changes are included in this PR?
Adds back TPC-H query results golden files to the repo. These files were generated using CometTPCHQuerySuite with Comet turned off, to make sure it is the same as Spark's results.
How are these changes tested?