-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 78
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Upgrade window UDF api #730
Labels
enhancement
New feature or request
Comments
Michael-J-Ward
added a commit
to Michael-J-Ward/datafusion-python
that referenced
this issue
Jun 14, 2024
@timsaucer could you take a look at this once #728 is merged? |
andygrove
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 14, 2024
* deps: update datafusion to 39.0.0, pyo3 to 0.21, and object_store to 0.10.1 `datafusion-common` also depends on `pyo3`, so they need to be upgraded together. * feat: remove GetIndexField datafusion replaced Expr::GetIndexField with a FieldAccessor trait. Ref apache/datafusion#10568 Ref apache/datafusion#10769 * feat: update ScalarFunction The field `func_name` was changed to `func` as part of removing `ScalarFunctionDefinition` upstream. Ref apache/datafusion#10325 * feat: incorporate upstream array_slice fixes Fixes #670 * update ExectionPlan::children impl for DatasetExec Ref apache/datafusion#10543 * update value_interval_daytime Ref apache/arrow-rs#5769 * update regexp_replace and regexp_match Fixes #677 * add gil-refs feature to pyo3 This silences pyo3's deprecation warnings for its new Bounds api. It's the 1st step of the migration, and should be removed before merge. Ref https://pyo3.rs/v0.21.0/migration#from-020-to-021 * fix signature for octet_length Ref apache/datafusion#10726 * update signature for covar_samp AggregateUDF expressions now have a builder API design, which removes arguments like filter and order_by Ref apache/datafusion#10545 Ref apache/datafusion#10492 * convert covar_pop to expr_fn api Ref: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10418/files * convert median to expr_fn api Ref apache/datafusion#10644 * convert variance sample to UDF Ref apache/datafusion#10667 * convert first_value and last_value to UDFs Ref apache/datafusion#10648 * checkpointing with a few todos to fix remaining compile errors * impl PyExpr::python_value for IntervalDayTime and IntervalMonthDayNano * convert sum aggregate function to UDF * remove unnecessary clone on double reference * apply cargo fmt * remove duplicate allow-dead-code annotation * update tpch examples for new pyarrow interval Fixes #665 * marked q11 tpch example as expected fail Ref #730 * add default stride of None back to array_slice
I’ll be happy to but on vacation so it will be a couple weeksOn Jun 14, 2024, at 1:49 PM, Michael J Ward ***@***.***> wrote:
@timsaucer could you take a look at this once #728 is merged?
—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Michael-J-Ward
added a commit
to Michael-J-Ward/datafusion-python
that referenced
this issue
Jun 25, 2024
Merged
Michael-J-Ward
added a commit
to Michael-J-Ward/datafusion-python
that referenced
this issue
Jun 25, 2024
andygrove
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 26, 2024
* provides workaround for half-migrated UDAF `sum` Ref #730 * provide compatibility for sqlparser::ast::NullTreatment This is now exposed as part of the API to `first_value` and `last_value` functions. If there's a more elegant way to achieve this, please let me know.
Merged
@Michael-J-Ward I know this issue was already closed but I have proposed a method to remove the work around. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Please describe what you are trying to do.
datafusion
is in process of removing their built-in window-functions, which our currentwindow
function relies on.sum
has already been removed which brakes theq11_important_stock_identification.py
tpch example.Additional context
AggregateFunction::Sum
enum variant is still defined, but can not be used.I suspect that the proper solution is to register the new UDAFs with the function registry.
As a workaround for releasing 39, I explicitly match on
name == "sum"
and redirect to the UDAF.UDAF Migration Epic: apache/datafusion#8709
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: